Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642210›Full record

ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2022

Effectiveness of Switching to Benralizumab in Severe Refractory Eosinophilic Asthma.

Ana Gómez-Bastero Fernández, Juan Francisco Medina Gallardo, Julio Delgado Romero, Auxiliadora Romero Falcón, Cristina Benito Bernáldez, Javier Gallego Borrego, Francisco Javier Álvarez-Gutiérrez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Switching Biological Therapies in Severe Asthma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Gómez-Bastero FernándezAsthma Unit of Pneumology, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4173-783X
Juan Francisco Medina GallardoAsthma Unit of Pneumology, Virgen Del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Julio Delgado RomeroAsthma Unit of Allergy, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Auxiliadora Romero FalcónAsthma Unit of Pneumology, Virgen Del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Cristina Benito BernáldezAsthma Unit of Pneumology, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-1342
Javier Gallego BorregoAsthma Unit of Pneumology, Valme University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Francisco Javier Álvarez-GutiérrezAsthma Unit of Pneumology, Virgen Del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0175-2824
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESHospital Universitario de Valme · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the α subunit of the IL-5 receptor. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of this agent with respect to lung function and symptom control in patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of benralizumab after switching previous treatment with other monoclonal antibodies. Patients and Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study under conditions of daily clinical practice. The study population comprised consecutively included patients with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma whose initial treatment with omalizumab or mepolizumab was switched to benralizumab. Patients were evaluated at 4 and 12 months after starting treatment with benralizumab. We analyzed asthma control, number of severe exacerbations, corticosteroid cycles, visits to the emergency department, and hospital admissions, as well as lung function. Similarly, we evaluated the response to treatment according to previously established criteria. Results: We evaluated 40 patients who switched from omalizumab (n=16) or mepolizumab (n=24) to benralizumab. The reasons for switching were lack of response in 30 cases, adverse effects in 9, and patient request in 1. Switching was followed by a significant decrease in the number of exacerbations, visits to the emergency department, and corticosteroid cycles, as well as improved ACT both at 4 and 12 months. However, no significant improvement in lung function was observed. Asthma control (including complete response and control) was achieved in 55% of patients (n=22) at 12 months. Specifically, a complete response was achieved in 30% of patients at 12 months (66.7% switching from omalizumab and 33.3% from mepolizumab). Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma who experience a partial response with omalizumab or mepolizumab could benefit from switching to benralizumab. This approach can reduce the number of exacerbations, visits to the emergency department, and corticosteroid cycles and improve control of asthma.

Indexed as

daily clinical practicemonoclonal antibodiessevere uncontrolled asthmatreatment optimization

Identifiers

PMID35642210
PMCPMC9148608
OpenAlexW4281560606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.