ArticlePeerJ2022
Healthcare applications of single camera markerless motion capture: a scoping review.
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Markerless Motion Capture to Quantify Functional Performance in Neurodegeneration: Systematic Review.JMIR aging · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of the applications of markerless motion capture (MMC) technology for clinical measurement in rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Markerless motion capture to quantify disability and functional performance in spine patients: a concurrent validity study bridging laboratory biomechanics and clinical practice.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Application of Deep Learning-Based Markerless Pose Estimation in a 3D Exergame System for Knee Osteoarthritis Exercise Management: Development and Preliminary Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of a handheld smartphone markerless gait-analysis tool using an estimated groundline in horses.Equine veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Reliability, agreement and variability of a markerless computer vision algorithm for equine gait analysis under field conditions.Equine veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Development, Reliability, and Validity Assessment of a Portable 3D Camera-Based System for Quantifying Postural Sway and Balance.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Monocular Markerless Motion Capture Enables Quantitative Assessment of Upper Extremity Reachable Workspace.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Clinician's Guide to Computer Vision in the Motion Capture Galaxy.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Validation of a markerless motion capture app for automated scoring of sit-to-stand, timed up and go, and short physical performance battery tests in adults with chronic disease.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- From Force Plates to AI: Establishing Validity and Reliability of a 2D AI-Camera System for Quantifying Sit-to-Stand Power Measurement.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Motion Capture Data Recovery: A Comprehensive Review and Future Outlook.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- From Wearable Sensor Networks to Markerless Motion Capture for Instrumental-Based Biomechanical Risk Assessment in Lifting Activities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessing single camera markerless motion capture with OpenSim inverse kinematics during upper limb activities of daily living.International biomechanics · 2025Article
- Markerless Motion Capture Parameters Associated with Fall Risk or Frailty: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Aging With Artificial Intelligence: How Technology Enhances Older Adults' Health and Independence.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025Review
- Evaluating Degenerative Lumbar Disease with Markerless 3D Motion Capture: Reliability and Validity in Sit-to-Stand Test.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Future of Clinical Active Shoulder Range of Motion Assessment, Best Practice, and Its Challenges: Narrative Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- DeepLabCut custom-trained model and the refinement function for gait analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Single camera markerless motion capture has the potential to facilitate at home movement assessment due to the ease of setup, portability, and affordable cost of the technology. However, it is not clear what the current healthcare applications of single camera markerless motion capture are and what information is being collected that may be used to inform clinical decision making. This review aims to map the available literature to highlight potential use cases and identify the limitations of the technology for clinicians and researchers interested in the collection of movement data. Survey Methodology: Studies were collected up to 14 January 2022 using Pubmed, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus using a systematic search. Data recorded included the description of the markerless system, clinical outcome measures, and biomechanical data mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework (ICF). Studies were grouped by patient population. Results: A total of 50 studies were included for data collection. Use cases for single camera markerless motion capture technology were identified for Neurological Injury in Children and Adults; Hereditary/Genetic Neuromuscular Disorders; Frailty; and Orthopaedic or Musculoskeletal groups. Single camera markerless systems were found to perform well in studies involving single plane measurements, such as in the analysis of infant general movements or spatiotemporal parameters of gait, when evaluated against 3D marker-based systems and a variety of clinical outcome measures. However, they were less capable than marker-based systems in studies requiring the tracking of detailed 3D kinematics or fine movements such as finger tracking. Conclusions: Single camera markerless motion capture offers great potential for extending the scope of movement analysis outside of laboratory settings in a practical way, but currently suffers from a lack of accuracy where detailed 3D kinematics are required for clinical decision making. Future work should therefore focus on improving tracking accuracy of movements that are out of plane relative to the camera orientation or affected by occlusion, such as supination and pronation of the forearm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.