Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35642163›Full record

Trial reportSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2022

[Hematoma Segmentation of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Based on Watershed and Region-Growing Algorithm].

Jie-Yi Zhao, Zheng-Song Zhou, Xiao-Yu Wang, Hao-Yu Zhang, Zong-Hao Duan, Shun-Min Wang, Hong-Li Wan, Tao Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie-Yi ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Zheng-Song ZhouChengdu Jincheng College, Chengdu 611731, China.
Xiao-Yu WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Hao-Yu ZhangChengdu Jincheng College, Chengdu 611731, China.
Zong-Hao DuanWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Shun-Min WangWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Hong-Li WanWest China-PUMC C.C.Chen Institute of Health, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Tao ZhangWest China-PUMC C.C.Chen Institute of Health, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CNChengdu Jincheng CollegeChengdu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To establish a brain hematoma CT image segmentation method based on watershed and region-growing algorithm so as to measure hematoma volume quickly and accurately, to explore the consistency between the results of this segmentation method and those of manual segmentation, the clinical gold standard, and to compare the results of this method with the calculation of the two Tada formulas commonly used in clinical practice. Methods: The preoperative CT images of 152 patients who were treated for spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage at the Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between January 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively collected. The CT images were randomly assigned, by using a random number table, to the training set, the test set and the validation set, which contained 100 patients, 22 patients and 30 patients, respectively. The labeling results of the training set and the test set were used in algorithm training and testing. Four methods, namely, manual segmentation, algorithm segmentation, i.e., segmentation calculation based on watershed and regional growth algorithm, Tada formula, i.e., the traditional Tada formula calculation, and accurate Tada formula, i.e., accurate Tada formula calculation based on 3D-Slicer, were applied on the validation set to measure the hematoma volume. The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data of subjects meeting the selection criteria of the study were manually segmented by two experienced neurosurgeons. The hematoma segmentation model was built based on watershed algorithm and regional growth algorithm. Seed point selected by neurosurgeons was taken as the starting point of growth. Regional grayscale difference criterion combined with manual segmentation validation were adopted to determine the regional growth threshold that met the segmentation precision requirements for intracranial hematoma. Using manual segmentation as the gold standard, Bland-Altman consistency analysis was used to verify the consistency of the three other methods for measuring hematoma volume. Results: With manual segmentation as the gold standard, among the three methods of measuring hematoma volume, algorithm segmentation had the smallest percentage error, the narrowest range of difference, the highest intra-group correlation coefficient (0.987), good consistency, and the narrowest 95% limits of agreement ( Conclusion: The segmentation method of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on watershed and regional growth algorithm shows stable measurement performance and good consistency with the clinical gold standard, which has considerable clinical significance, but it still needs further validation with more clinical samples.

Indexed as

HematomaTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsCerebral HemorrhageHumansRetrospective StudiesAIAlgorithmAutomatic recognitionCerebral hemorrhageCTsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35642163
PMCPMC10409423
OpenAlexW4282936429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.