ArticleBMC plant biology2022
Genomic insights into positive selection during barley domestication.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Comparative Genomics and Population Genomics Reveal the Genomic and Epigenomic Basis of Barley (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pangenome-wide identification of chloroplast RNA splicing and ribosome maturation (CRM) genes in eight Pyrus genomes indicated their involvement in multiple stresses.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating ATAC-Seq and Pan-Genomics Identifies Stress-MemoryFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Genome-wide characterization of R2R3-MYB gene family inFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Editorial: Genomic selection and characterization in cereals.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare) is widely used in animal feed, beverages, and foods and has become a model crop for molecular evolutionary studies. Few studies have examined the evolutionary fates of different types of genes in barley during the domestication process.
resultsThe rates of nonsynonymous substitution (Ka) to synonymous substitution (Ks) were calculated by comparing orthologous genes in different barley groups (wild vs. landrace and landrace vs. improved cultivar). The rates of evolution, properties, expression patterns, and diversity of positively selected genes (PSGs) and negatively selected genes (NSGs) were compared. PSGs evolved more rapidly, possessed fewer exons, and had lower GC content than NSGs; they were also shorter and had shorter intron, exon, and first exon lengths. Expression levels were lower, the tissue specificity of expression was higher, and codon usage bias was weaker for PSGs than for NSGs. Nucleotide diversity analysis revealed that PSGs have undergone a more severe genetic bottleneck than NSGs. Several candidate PSGs were involved in plant growth and development, which might make them as excellent targets for the molecular breeding of barley.
conclusionsOur comprehensive analysis of the evolutionary, structural, and functional divergence between PSGs and NSGs in barley provides new insight into the evolutionary trajectory of barley during domestication. Our findings also aid future functional studies of PSGs in barley.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.