Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641922›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Efficient automatic 3D segmentation of cell nuclei for high-content screening.

Mariusz Marzec, Adam Piórkowski, Arkadiusz Gertych

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariusz MarzecFaculty of Science and Technology, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Silesia, Bedzinska St. 39, 41-200, Sosnowiec, Poland. mariusz.marzec@us.edu.pl.
Adam PiórkowskiDepartment of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059, Cracow, Poland.
Arkadiusz GertychDepartment of Surgery, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
AGH University of Krakow · PLInstitute of Medical Technology and Equipment · PLUniversity of Silesia in Katowice · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-content screening (HCS) is a pre-clinical approach for the assessment of drug efficacy. On modern platforms, it involves fluorescent image capture using three-dimensional (3D) scanning microscopy. Segmentation of cell nuclei in 3D images is an essential prerequisite to quantify captured fluorescence in cells for screening. However, this segmentation is challenging due to variabilities in cell confluency, drug-induced alterations in cell morphology, and gradual degradation of fluorescence with the depth of scanning. Despite advances in algorithms for segmenting nuclei for HCS, robust 3D methods that are insensitive to these conditions are still lacking.

resultsWe have developed an algorithm which first generates a 3D nuclear mask in the original images. Next, an iterative 3D marker-controlled watershed segmentation is applied to downsized images to segment adjacent nuclei under the mask. In the last step, borders of segmented nuclei are adjusted in the original images based on local nucleus and background intensities. The method was developed using a set of 10 3D images. Extensive tests on a separate set of 27 3D images containing 2,367 nuclei demonstrated that our method, in comparison with 6 reference methods, achieved the highest precision (PR = 0.97), recall (RE = 0.88) and F1-score (F1 = 0.93) of nuclei detection. The Jaccard index (JI = 0.83), which reflects the accuracy of nuclei delineation, was similar to that yielded by all reference approaches. Our method was on average more than twice as fast as the reference method that produced the best results. Additional tests carried out on three stacked 3D images comprising heterogenous nuclei yielded average PR = 0.96, RE = 0.84, F1 = 0.89, and JI = 0.80.

conclusionsThe high-performance metrics yielded by the proposed approach suggest that it can be used to reliably delineate nuclei in 3D images of monolayered and stacked cells exposed to cytotoxic drugs.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusImaging, Three-DimensionalAlgorithmsResearch3D nuclei segmentationAutomated analysisBio-image informaticsHigh-content screeningImage analysisImage processing

Identifiers

PMID35641922
PMCPMC9153210
OpenAlexW4281787429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.