ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2022
Semantically congruent audiovisual integration with modal-based attention accelerates auditory short-term memory retrieval.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term mind-body exercise enhances cognitive control over working memory-driven attentional capture.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Semantic Bimodal Presentation Differentially Slows Working Memory Retrieval.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Effect of Target Semantic Consistency in Different Sequence Positions and Processing Modes on T2 Recognition: Integration and Suppression Based on Cross-Modal Processing.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- An Exploration of the Effects of Cross-Modal Tasks on Selective Attention.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The dissociation of semantically congruent and incongruent cross-modal effects on the visual attentional blink.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence has shown that multisensory integration benefits to unisensory perception performance are asymmetric and that auditory perception performance can receive more multisensory benefits, especially when the attention focus is directed toward a task-irrelevant visual stimulus. At present, whether the benefits of semantically (in)congruent multisensory integration with modal-based attention for subsequent unisensory short-term memory (STM) retrieval are also asymmetric remains unclear. Using a delayed matching-to-sample paradigm, the present study investigated this issue by manipulating the attention focus during multisensory memory encoding. The results revealed that both visual and auditory STM retrieval reaction times were faster under semantically congruent multisensory conditions than under unisensory memory encoding conditions. We suggest that coherent multisensory representation formation might be optimized by restricted multisensory encoding and can be rapidly triggered by subsequent unisensory memory retrieval demands. Crucially, auditory STM retrieval is exclusively accelerated by semantically congruent multisensory memory encoding, indicating that the less effective sensory modality of memory retrieval relies more on the coherent prior formation of a multisensory representation optimized by modal-based attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35641858What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.