Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641830›Full record

Observational studyNeuroradiology2022

Clinical and radiological outcomes following insertion of a novel removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer: an initial experience.

Luca Jacopo Pavan, Danoob Dalili, Aldo Eros De Vivo, Arthur Hamel-Senecal, Federico Torre, Alexandre Rudel, Luigi Manfré, Nicolas Amoretti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05203666 (A Multicentric Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of All Patients Treated With a Removable Percutaneous Interspinous Process Spacer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05203666 completednot on this map

A Multicentric Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical and Radiologic Outcome of All Patients Treated With a Removable Percutaneous Interspinous Process Spacer (LobsterProject® Techlamed®) for Symptomatic Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in 2019.

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceRan2021 to 2021Enrolled59ConditionsDegenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Neurologic Intermittent ClaudicationArmspercutaneous removable interspinous process
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luca Jacopo PavanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nice University Hospital, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France. lucajpavan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9172-233X
Danoob DaliliSouth West London, Elective Orthopaedic Centre (SWLEOC), Epsom, KT18 7EG, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6872-2040
Aldo Eros De VivoDepartment of Radiology, IOM Mediterranean Oncology Institute, Viagrande, CT, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9874-2800
Arthur Hamel-SenecalDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nice University Hospital, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France.
Federico TorreDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nice University Hospital, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-8265
Alexandre RudelDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nice University Hospital, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-1894
Luigi ManfréDepartment of Radiology, IOM Mediterranean Oncology Institute, Viagrande, CT, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7314-2294
Nicolas AmorettiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nice University Hospital, Hôpital Pasteur 2, Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5043-7126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of patients treated with a removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer (IPS) (LobsterProject® Techlamed®) for symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).

methodsAll patients treated in two centres with this IPS during 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Procedures were performed under deep sedation or general anaesthesia by two interventional radiologists. Patients were clinically evaluated before intervention and at 3-month follow-up with Visual Analog Scales for pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and radiologically with MRI or CT scans. Neural foramina were independently measured for each patient on pre- and post-procedural CT scans by two radiologists.

resultsFifty-nine patients were treated in the selected period of which fifty-eight had complete documentation (mean age 71.2 ± 9.2 years [55-92], 32 males, 26 females). Forty-eight interventions were performed under deep sedation and ten under general anaesthesia, without procedural complications. Clinical follow-up at 3 months showed a significant reduction of pain (VAS from 83 ± 9 to 29 ± 19, - 65%; p < 0.001) and an improvement in functional outcomes (ODI from 31 ± 12 to 13 ± 10%, - 58%; p < 0.001). There was one case of unsatisfactory positioning post procedure, two cases of posterior migration at 3-month follow-up and one case of spinous process fracture. Mean neural foramina area increased from 77 ± 23 to 95 ± 27 mm

conclusionPercutaneous minimally invasive insertion of a removable IPS device demonstrates a favourable safety profile, good clinical outcomes at 3 months, and apparent anatomical increase in foraminal dimensions.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05203666-Release Date: 21

Indexed as

Spinal StenosisAgedAged, 80 and overDecompression, SurgicalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPainProstheses and ImplantsReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeComputed tomographyIntermittent claudicationInterspinous spacerInterventional radiologySpinal stenosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.