Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641773›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

GWAS Case Studies in Wheat.

Deepmala Sehgal, Susanne Dreisigacker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Wheat Omics: Advancements and Opportunities.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepmala SehgalInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera Mex-Veracruz, Texcoco, CP, Mexico. d.sehgal@cgiar.org.
Susanne DreisigackerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera Mex-Veracruz, Texcoco, CP, Mexico. s.dreisigacker@cgiar.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advancements in next-generation sequencing technologies, leading to millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms in all crop species including wheat, genome-wide association study (GWAS) has become a leading approach for trait dissection. In wheat, GWAS has been conducted for a plethora of traits and more and more studies are being conducted and reported in journals. While application of GWAS has become a routine in wheat using the standardized approaches, there has been a great leap forward using newer models and combination of GWAS with other sets of data. This chapter has reviewed all these latest advancements in GWAS in wheat by citing the most important studies and their outputs. Specially, we have focused on studies that conducted meta-GWAS, multilocus GWAS, haplotype-based GWAS, Environmental- and Eigen-GWAS, and/or GWAS combined with gene regulatory network and pathway analyses or epistatic interactions analyses; all these have taken the association mapping approach to new heights in wheat.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyTriticumHaplotypesPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociEigen-GWASEnvironmental GWASEpistatic interactionsHaplotypesMetaGWASMultilocus GWAS

Identifiers

PMID35641773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.