Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641761›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Development, Preparation, and Curation of High-Throughput Phenotypic Data for Genome-Wide Association Studies: A Sample Pipeline in R.

Pasquale Tripodi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aphanomyces euteiches causes disease in Lathyrus sativus with a globally diverse, polygenic resistance landscape.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pasquale TripodiCREA Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Pontecagnano Faiano, Italy. pasquale.tripodi@crea.gov.it.
Centro di Ricerca per l’Orticoltura · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have benefited from the advances of sequencing methods for the generation of high-density genomic data. By bridging genotype to phenotype, several genes have been associated with traits of agricultural interest. Despite this, there is still a gap between genotyping and phenotyping due to the large difference in throughput between the two disciplines. Although cutting-edge phenomics technologies are available to the community, their costs are still prohibitive at the small lab level. Semiautomated methods of investigation provide a valid alternative to generate large-scale phenotyping data able to deeply investigate the characteristics of different plant organs. Beyond automation, phenomics data management is another major constraint to consider; while bioinformatics pipelines are well-trained for releasing high-quality genomic data, fewer efforts have been done for phenotyping information. This chapter provides a guide for generating large-scale data related to the size and shape of fruits, leaves, seeds, and roots and for downstream analysis for curation and preparation of clean datasets, through removal of outliers and performing primary statistical analysis. Different steps to be carried out in the R environment will be shown for gathering the appropriate input information to use in GWAS avoiding any possible bias.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPhenomicsGenomeGenomicsPhenotypeDescriptive statisticsGWA mappingImaging softwareLarge-scale phenotypingOutliersR programming

Identifiers

PMID35641761
OpenAlexW4285079220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.