Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641758›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Genome-Wide Association Study Statistical Models: A Review.

Mohsen Yoosefzadeh-Najafabadi, Milad Eskandari, François Belzile, Davoud Torkamaneh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Periodontal diseases in Africa.Periodontology 2000 · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohsen Yoosefzadeh-NajafabadiDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Milad EskandariDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
François BelzileDépartement de Phytologie, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Davoud TorkamanehDépartement de Phytologie, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada. davoud.torkamaneh.1@ulaval.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical models are at the core of the genome-wide association study (GWAS). In this chapter, we provide an overview of single- and multilocus statistical models, Bayesian, and machine learning approaches for association studies in plants. These models are discussed based on their basic methodology, cofactors adjustment accounted for, statistical power and computational efficiency. New statistical models and machine learning algorithms are both showing improved performance in detecting missed signals, rare mutations and prioritizing causal genetic variants; nevertheless, further optimization and validation studies are required to maximize the power of GWAS.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremMachine LearningComputational efficiencyGWASSignificance thresholdStatistical modelsStatistical power

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.