Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641671›Full record

ArticleCell biology and toxicology2023

Direct transcriptomic comparison of xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity pathway induction of airway epithelium models at an air-liquid interface generated from induced pluripotent stem cells and primary bronchial epithelial cells.

Ivo Djidrovski, Maria Georgiou, Elena Tasinato, Martin O Leonard, Jelle Van den Bor, Majlinda Lako, Lyle Armstrong

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell biology and toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivo DjidrovskiThe Biosphere, Newcells Biotech Ltd., Draymans way, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5BX, UK.
Maria GeorgiouBiosciences Institute, The International Centre for Life, Newcastle University, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK.
Elena TasinatoThe Biosphere, Newcells Biotech Ltd., Draymans way, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5BX, UK.
Martin O LeonardToxicology Department, Public Health England, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Harwell Campus, Chilton, OX11 0RQ, UK.
Jelle Van den BorDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Institute of Molecular and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Majlinda LakoBiosciences Institute, The International Centre for Life, Newcastle University, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK.
Lyle ArmstrongThe Biosphere, Newcells Biotech Ltd., Draymans way, Newcastle Helix, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5BX, UK. lyle.armstrong@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7234-9362
Centre for Life · GBPublic Health England · GBVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/B/14779Medical Research Council G0301182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The airway epithelium represents the main barrier between inhaled air and the tissues of the respiratory tract and is therefore an important point of contact with xenobiotic substances into the human body. Several studies have recently shown that in vitro models of the airway grown at an air-liquid interface (ALI) can be particularly useful to obtain mechanistic information about the toxicity of chemical compounds. However, such methods are not very amenable to high throughput since the primary cells cannot be expanded indefinitely in culture to obtain a sustainable number of cells. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have become a popular option in the recent years for modelling the airways of the lung, but despite progress in the field, such models have so far not been assessed for their ability to metabolise xenobiotic compounds and how they compare to the primary bronchial airway model (pBAE). Here, we report a comparative analysis by TempoSeq (oligo-directed sequencing) of an iPSC-derived airway model (iBAE) with a primary bronchial airway model (pBAE). The iBAE and pBAE were differentiated at an ALI and then evaluated in a 5-compound screen with exposure to a sub-lethal concentration of each compound for 24 h. We found that despite lower expression of xenobiotic metabolism genes, the iBAE similarly predicted the toxic pathways when compared to the pBAE model. Our results show that iPSC airway models at ALI show promise for inhalation toxicity assessments with further development.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsEpithelial CellsEpitheliumHumansRespiratory MucosaTranscriptomeXenobioticsXenobioticsAir–liquid interfaceAirway epitheliumInduced pluripotent stem cellsToxicity assessmentTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID35641671
PMCPMC10042770
OpenAlexW4282920618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read26
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.