Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641574›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2022

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery at Primary and Secondary Hospitals in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC's): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendation.

Ravi Oodit, Bruce M Biccard, Eugenio Panieri, Adrian O Alvarez, Marianna R S Sioson, Salome Maswime, Viju Thomas, Hyla-Louise Kluyts, Carol J Peden, Hans D de Boer and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Ravi OoditDivision of Global Surgery, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Bruce M BiccardDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Eugenio PanieriDivision of General Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Adrian O AlvarezAnesthesia Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Teniente General Juan Domingo Peron, 4190, C1199ABB, Beunos Aires, Argentina.
Marianna R S SiosonHead Section of Medical Nutrition, Department of Medicine and ERAS Team, The Medical City, Ortigas Avenue, Manila, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Salome MaswimeDivision of Global Surgery, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Viju ThomasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tygerberg Hospital and University of Stellenbosch, Francie Van Zyl Drive, Parow, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
Hyla-Louise KluytsDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa, Molotlegi Street, P.O. Box 60, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria, 0204, Gauteng, South Africa.
Carol J PedenKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Hans D de BoerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital Groningen, Van Swietenplein 1, 9728 NT, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mary BrindleCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, London, Canada.
Nader K FrancisDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science- UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Gregg NelsonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, 1331 29 St NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N2, Canada.
Ulf O GustafssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Entrevägen 2, 19257, Stockholm, Danderyd, Sweden.
Olle LjungqvistSchool of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden. olle.ljungqvist@oru.se.
University of Cape Town · ZAAlberta Children's Hospital · CADepartment of Science and Technology · INHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARKarolinska Institutet · SEMartini Ziekenhuis · NLNutrition Center of the Philippines · PHÖrebro University · SESefako Makgatho Health Sciences University · ZATygerberg Hospital · ZAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline for primary and secondary hospitals in low-middle-income countries (LMIC's) for elective abdominal and gynecologic care.

methodsThe ERAS LMIC Guidelines group was established by the ERAS® Society in collaboration with different representatives of perioperative care from LMIC's. The group consisted of seven members from the ERAS® Society and eight members from LMIC's. An updated systematic literature search and evaluation of evidence from previous ERAS® guidelines was performed by the leading authors of the Colorectal (2018) and Gynecologic (2019) surgery guidelines (Gustafsson et al in World J Surg 43:6592-695, Nelson et al in Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(4):651-668). Meta-analyses randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies from both HIC's and LMIC's were considered for each perioperative item. The members in the LMIC group then applied the current evidence and adapted the recommendations for each intervention as well as identifying possible new items relevant to LMIC's. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (GRADE) methodology was used to determine the quality of the published evidence. The strength of the recommendations was based on importance of the problem, quality of evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable effects, acceptability to key stakeholders, cost of implementation and specifically the feasibility of implementing in LMIC's and determined through discussions and consensus.

resultsIn addition to previously described ERAS® Society interventions, the following items were included, revised or discussed: the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), preoperative routine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in countries with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS (CD4 and viral load for those patients that are HIV positive), delirium screening and prevention, COVID 19 screening, VTE prophylaxis, immuno-nutrition, prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and a standardized postoperative monitoring guideline.

conclusionsThese guidelines are seen as a starting point to address the urgent need to improve perioperative care and to effect data-driven, evidence-based care in LMIC's.

Indexed as

COVID-19Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryDeveloping CountriesHospitalsHumansPerioperative Care

Identifiers

PMID35641574
PMCPMC9154207
OpenAlexW4281741732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.