SynthesisPediatric research2023
Machine learning for understanding and predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes in premature infants: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Machine learning techniques for predicting neurodevelopmental impairments in premature infants: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants: An Exploratory Multivariable Analysis Including Sonographic Brain Volume Trajectories-Data from the NeoNEVS Project.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Research progress in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of diseases in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Review
- Machine-Learning Models Outperform Clinicians in Predicting Postnatal Growth Failure Among Very Low Birth Weight Infants.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Predictive associations between brain functional connectivity, motor abilities, and executive function development in early childhood: a longitudinal machine learning study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Neurodevelopmental outcomes and predictors among late preterm infants: a 6-month prospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Machine learning for outcome prediction in preterm infants: opportunities and challenges.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Infants Sucking Pattern Identification Using Machine-Learned Computational Modeling.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2025Article
- A step towards predicting what the future holds for those born extremely preterm.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- High resource neuroscience research: use and interpret with care.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine learning prediction of feeding intolerance in preterm infants: a pre-feeding risk stratification model.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Functional connectivity as a prognostic biomarker for neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants without severe brain injury.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Prediction of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants: Comparing Machine Learning Methods to Logistic Regression.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting neurodevelopmental disorders using machine learning models and electronic health records - status of the field.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Outcome Prediction in Neonates with Encephalopathy (AI-OPiNE).Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Predicting 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants using multimodal structural brain magnetic resonance imaging with local connectivity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning has been attracting increasing attention for use in healthcare applications, including neonatal medicine. One application for this tool is in understanding and predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. In this study, we have carried out a systematic review to identify findings and challenges to date.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Four databases were searched in February 2022, with articles then screened in a non-blinded manner by two authors.
resultsThe literature search returned 278 studies, with 11 meeting the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Convolutional neural networks were the most common machine learning approach, with most studies seeking to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes from images and connectomes describing brain structure and function. Studies to date also sought to identify features predictive of outcomes; however, results varied greatly.
conclusionsInitial studies in this field have achieved promising results; however, many machine learning techniques remain to be explored, and the consensus is yet to be reached on which clinical and brain features are most predictive of neurodevelopmental outcomes. IMPACT: This systematic review looks at the question of whether machine learning can be used to predict and understand neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. Our review finds that promising initial works have been conducted in this field, but many challenges and opportunities remain. Quality assessment of relevant articles is conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. This work identifies challenges that remain and suggests several key directions for future research. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review to explore this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.