Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641546›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Chromatic discrimination measures in mature observers depend on the response window.

Julien Fars, Thiago P Fernandes, Cord Huchzermeyer, Jan Kremers, Galina V Paramei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Julien FarsDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. julien.fars@fau.de.
Thiago P FernandesDepartment of Psychology, Federal University of Paraiba, Cidade Universitaria S/N, Joao Pessoa, 58051-900, Brazil.
Cord HuchzermeyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Jan KremersDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Galina V ParameiDepartment of Psychology, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park, Liverpool, L16 9JD, UK. parameg@hope.ac.uk.
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DELiverpool Hope University · GBUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our past anecdotal evidence prompted that a longer response window (RW) in the Trivector test (Cambridge Colour Test) improved mature observers' estimates of chromatic discrimination. Here, we systematically explored whether RW variation affects chromatic discrimination thresholds measured by the length of Protan, Deutan and Tritan vectors. We employed the Trivector test with three RWs: 3 s, 5 s, and 8 s. Data of 30 healthy normal trichromats were stratified as age groups: 'young' (20-29 years), 'middle-aged' (31-48 years), and 'mature' (57-64 years). We found that for the 'young' and 'middle-aged', the thresholds were comparable at all tested RWs. However, the RW effect was apparent for the 'mature' observers: their Protan and Tritan thresholds decreased at 8-s RW compared to 3-s RW; moreover, their Tritan threshold decreased at 5-s RW compared to 3-s RW. Elevated discrimination thresholds at shorter RWs imply that for accurate performance, older observers require longer stimulus exposure and are indicative of ageing effects manifested by an increase in critical processing duration. Acknowledging low numbers in our 'middle-aged' and 'mature' samples, we consider our study as pilot. Nonetheless, our findings encourage us to advocate a RW extension in the Trivector protocol for testing mature observers, to ensure veridical measures of their chromatic discrimination by disentangling these from other ageing effects-slowing down of both motor responses and visual processing.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionColor Perception TestsCognitionVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID35641546
PMCPMC9156755
OpenAlexW4281904290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.