Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641543›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Evidence for superior encoding of detailed visual memories in deaf signers.

Michael Craig, Michaela Dewar, Graham Turner, Trudi Collier, Narinder Kapur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael CraigDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. michael2.craig@northumbria.ac.uk.
Michaela DewarMemory Lab, Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Graham TurnerCentre for Translation and Interpreting Studies in Scotland, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Trudi CollierMemory Lab, Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
Narinder KapurDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, Department of Clinical, Education and Health Psychology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Alzheimer's Society 316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence shows that deaf signers outperform hearing non-signers in some tests of visual attention and discrimination. Furthermore, they can retain visual information better over short periods, i.e., seconds. However, it is unknown if deaf signers' retention of detailed visual information is superior following more extended periods. We report a study investigating this possibility. Our data revealed that deaf individuals outperformed hearing people in a visual long-term memory test that probed the fine detail of new memories. Deaf individuals also performed better in a scene-discrimination test, which correlated positively with performance on the long-term memory test. Our findings provide evidence that deaf signers can demonstrate superior visual long-term memory, possibly because of enhanced visual attention during encoding. The relative contributions of factors including sign language fluency, protracted practice, and neural plasticity are still to be established. Our findings add to evidence showing that deaf signers are at an advantage in some respects, including the retention of detailed visual memories over the longer term.

Indexed as

DeafnessHearingHumansMemoryNeuronal PlasticitySign Language

Identifiers

PMID35641543
PMCPMC9156778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.