ArticleNPJ vaccines2022
Efficacy, T cell activation and antibody responses in accelerated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite chemoprophylaxis vaccine regimens.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- PfSPZ Vaccine induces focused humoral immune response in HIV positive and negative Tanzanian adults.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- Positive-unlabeled learning identifies vaccine candidate antigens in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Review
- Five decades of clinical assessment of whole-sporozoite malaria vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Sporozoite immunization: innovative translational science to support the fight against malaria.Expert review of vaccinesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Repeated direct venous inoculation of Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (PfSPZ) together with antimalarial chemoprophylaxis (PfSPZ-CVac) is the most potent way to induce sterile immunity against P. falciparum infection in malaria-naive volunteers. However, established schedules are complex and long. Here, we tested two accelerated three-dose schedules (28- and 10-day regimen) assessing efficacy by controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) against placebo, comparing vaccine-specific T cell and antibody responses by antigen-reactive T cell enrichment (ARTE) and protein microarray, respectively. Both regimens were similarly efficacious (67 and 63% vaccine efficacy) but different in the induction of vaccine-specific T cells and antibodies. The 10-day regimen resulted in higher numbers of antigen-specific CD4+ effector memory pro-inflammatory T cells and a broader antibody response compared with the 28-day regimen. Usually in nature, P. falciparum liver stage lasts about 6.5 days. The short vaccination-interval of the 10-day regimen prolongs the time of continuous exposure to liver-stage parasites, which may explain the stronger response. Besides dose and number of vaccinations, duration of liver-stage exposure is a factor to optimize PfSPZ-CVac immunogenicity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.