ArticleScientific data2022
Disaggregated data on age and sex for the first 250 days of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bucharest, Romania.
Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alcohol consumption and the risk of coronavirus disease 2019: A prospective cohort study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Processed food intake assortativity in the personal networks of older adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Online Media Use and COVID-19 Vaccination in Real-World Personal Networks: Quantitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Data analysis evidence beyond correlation of a possible causal impact of weather on the COVID-19 spread, mediated by human mobility.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Risks and Preventions for Pregnant Women and Their Preterm Infants in a World with COVID-19: A Narrative Review.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Occupations and their impact on the spreading of COVID-19 in urban communities.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Disaggregated data on age and sex for the first 250 days of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bucharest, Romania.Scientific data · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experts worldwide have constantly been calling for high-quality open-access epidemiological data, given the fast-evolving nature of the COVID-19 pandemic. Disaggregated high-level granularity records are still scant despite being essential to corroborate the effectiveness of virus containment measures and even vaccination strategies. We provide a complete dataset containing disaggregated epidemiological information about all the COVID-19 patients officially reported during the first 250 days of the COVID-19 pandemic in Bucharest (Romania). We give the sex, age, and the COVID-19 infection confirmation date for 46,440 individual cases, between March 7
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.