Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641186›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Sensory Evidence Accumulation Using Optic Flow in a Naturalistic Navigation Task.

Panos Alefantis, Kaushik Lakshminarasimhan, Eric Avila, Jean-Paul Noel, Xaq Pitkow, Dora E Angelaki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perceptual-Cognitive Integration for Goal-Directed Action in Naturalistic Environments.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  17. Causal inference during closed-loop navigation: parsing of self- and object-motion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Self-motion perception and sequential decision-making: where are we heading?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Panos AlefantisCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003 pa77@nyu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5512-7488
Kaushik LakshminarasimhanCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
Eric AvilaCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
Jean-Paul NoelCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
Xaq PitkowDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-329X
Dora E AngelakiCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
New York University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCenter for Theoretical Physics · PL

Funding

Project C: Neural basis of causal inference in continuous navigationU19NS118246 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEANGELIS, GREGORY C · 2020 to 2024
$12.0M
Plasticity during visual/vestibular conflictR01DC014678 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ANGELAKI, DORA · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
CRCNS: Neural computations for continuous control in virtual reality foragingR01NS120407 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI PITKOW, ZACHARY SAMUEL · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014678NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS120407NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS118246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory evidence accumulation is considered a hallmark of decision-making in noisy environments. Integration of sensory inputs has been traditionally studied using passive stimuli, segregating perception from action. Lessons learned from this approach, however, may not generalize to ethological behaviors like navigation, where there is an active interplay between perception and action. We designed a sensory-based sequential decision task in virtual reality in which humans and monkeys navigated to a memorized location by integrating optic flow generated by their own joystick movements. A major challenge in such closed-loop tasks is that subjects' actions will determine future sensory input, causing ambiguity about whether they rely on sensory input rather than expectations based solely on a learned model of the dynamics. To test whether subjects integrated optic flow over time, we used three independent experimental manipulations, unpredictable optic flow perturbations, which pushed subjects off their trajectory; gain manipulation of the joystick controller, which changed the consequences of actions; and manipulation of the optic flow density, which changed the information borne by sensory evidence. Our results suggest that both macaques (male) and humans (female/male) relied heavily on optic flow, thereby demonstrating a critical role for sensory evidence accumulation during naturalistic action-perception closed-loop tasks.

Indexed as

Optic FlowAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMammalsMovementclosed loopnaturalisticnavigationnonhuman primatessensory accumulationvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35641186
PMCPMC9270913
OpenAlexW4282939734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.