Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641150›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Characterizing and explaining the impact of disease-associated mutations in proteins without known structures or structural homologs.

Neeladri Sen, Ivan Anishchenko, Nicola Bordin, Ian Sillitoe, Sameer Velankar, David Baker, Christine Orengo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Neeladri SenInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3324-5755
Ivan AnishchenkoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Nicola BordinInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6568-9035
Ian SillitoeInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Sameer VelankarProtein Data Bank in Europe, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK.
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Christine OrengoInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology · GBEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R009597/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R014892/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S017135/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S020144/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in human proteins lead to diseases. The structure of these proteins can help understand the mechanism of such diseases and develop therapeutics against them. With improved deep learning techniques, such as RoseTTAFold and AlphaFold, we can predict the structure of proteins even in the absence of structural homologs. We modeled and extracted the domains from 553 disease-associated human proteins without known protein structures or close homologs in the Protein Databank. We noticed that the model quality was higher and the Root mean square deviation (RMSD) lower between AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold models for domains that could be assigned to CATH families as compared to those which could only be assigned to Pfam families of unknown structure or could not be assigned to either. We predicted ligand-binding sites, protein-protein interfaces and conserved residues in these predicted structures. We then explored whether the disease-associated missense mutations were in the proximity of these predicted functional sites, whether they destabilized the protein structure based on ddG calculations or whether they were predicted to be pathogenic. We could explain 80% of these disease-associated mutations based on proximity to functional sites, structural destabilization or pathogenicity. When compared to polymorphisms, a larger percentage of disease-associated missense mutations were buried, closer to predicted functional sites, predicted as destabilizing and pathogenic. Usage of models from the two state-of-the-art techniques provide better confidence in our predictions, and we explain 93 additional mutations based on RoseTTAFold models which could not be explained based solely on AlphaFold models.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseProteinsDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, MolecularMutationProteinsAlphaFolddisease-associatedfunctional sitemutationprotein structure modelingRoseTTAFold

Identifiers

PMID35641150
PMCPMC9294430
OpenAlexW4225516213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.