Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641123›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

A framework for the oversight and local deployment of safe and high-quality prediction models.

Armando D Bedoya, Nicoleta J Economou-Zavlanos, Benjamin A Goldstein, Allison Young, J Eric Jelovsek, Cara O'Brien, Amanda B Parrish, Scott Elengold, Kay Lytle, Suresh Balu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Global burden of subarachnoid hemorrhage in young adults, 1990-2021: disparities, risk factors, and projections to 2050.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Establishing and implementing a responsible artificial intelligence framework: a 1-year review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Armando D BedoyaDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6496-7024
Nicoleta J Economou-ZavlanosDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Benjamin A GoldsteinDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Allison YoungDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Eric JelovsekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7196-817X
Cara O'BrienDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Amanda B ParrishDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Scott ElengoldOffice of Counsel, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kay LytleDuke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Suresh BaluDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Erich HuangDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Eric G PoonDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7251-5842
Michael J PencinaDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence/machine learning models are being rapidly developed and used in clinical practice. However, many models are deployed without a clear understanding of clinical or operational impact and frequently lack monitoring plans that can detect potential safety signals. There is a lack of consensus in establishing governance to deploy, pilot, and monitor algorithms within operational healthcare delivery workflows. Here, we describe a governance framework that combines current regulatory best practices and lifecycle management of predictive models being used for clinical care. Since January 2021, we have successfully added models to our governance portfolio and are currently managing 52 models.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAlgorithmsDelivery of Health Careartificial intelligencedecision support systems—clinicalGovernance Models—organizationalHealth Information Management/Organization & Administrationmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35641123
PMCPMC9382367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.