Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35641101›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2022

Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score.

Mayooran Namasivayam, Paul D Myers, John V Guttag, Romain Capoulade, Philippe Pibarot, Michael H Picard, Judy Hung, Collin M Stultz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mayooran NamasivayamDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA mnamasivayam@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8985-3947
Paul D MyersDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
John V GuttagComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Romain Capouladel'institut du thorax, CHU Nantes, CNRS, INSERM, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7233-7409
Philippe PibarotCardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3607-279X
Michael H PicardDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Judy HungDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Collin M StultzDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

Echocardiography to Predict Recurrent IMR After Surgical Mitral Valve ReplacementR01HL103723 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GORMAN, ROBERT C, HUNG, JUDY W · 2011 to 2020
$5.3M
CIHR FDN-143225CIHR MOP-114997NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use echocardiographic and clinical features to develop an explainable clinical risk prediction model in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), including those with low-gradient AS (LGAS), using machine learning (ML).

methodsIn 1130 patients with moderate or severe AS, we used bootstrap lasso regression (BLR), an ML method, to identify echocardiographic and clinical features important for predicting the combined outcome of all-cause mortality or aortic valve replacement (AVR) within 5 years after the initial echocardiogram. A separate hold out set, from a different centre (n=540), was used to test the generality of the model. We also evaluated model performance with respect to each outcome separately and in different subgroups, including patients with LGAS.

resultsOut of 69 available variables, 26 features were identified as predictive by BLR and expert knowledge was used to further reduce this set to 9 easily available and input features without loss of efficacy. A ridge logistic regression model constructed using these features had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.74 for the combined outcome of mortality/AVR. The model reliably identified patients at high risk of death in years 2-5 (HRs ≥2.0, upper vs other quartiles, for years 2-5, p<0.05, p=not significant in year 1) and was also predictive in the cohort with LGAS (n=383, HRs≥3.3, p<0.05). The model performed similarly well in the independent hold out set (AUC 0.78, HR ≥2.5 in years 1-5, p<0.05).

conclusionIn two separate longitudinal databases, ML identified prognostic features and produced an algorithm that predicts outcome for up to 5 years of follow-up in patients with AS, including patients with LGAS. Our algorithm, the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score, is available online for public use.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAortic ValveHumansMachine Learningaortic stenosisArtificial intelligenceclinical outcomeechocardiographymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35641101
PMCPMC9157386
OpenAlexW4282004630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.