ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022
Population Genetics of Reproductive Genes in Haplodiploid Species.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Haplodiploidy accelerates mitogenome evolution in insects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Haploid and Sexual Selection Shape the Rate of Evolution of Genes across the Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genome.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many animal species are haplodiploid: their fertilized eggs develop into diploid females and their unfertilized eggs develop into haploid males. The unique genetic features of haplodiploidy raise the prospect that these systems can be used to disentangle the population genetic consequences of haploid and diploid selection. To this end, sex-specific reproductive genes are of particular interest because, while they are shared within the same genome, they consistently experience selection in different ploidal environments. However, other features of these genes, including sex-specific expression and putative involvement in postcopulatory sexual selection, are potentially confounding factors because they may also impact the efficacy of selection asymmetrically between the sexes. Thus, to properly interpret evolutionary genomic patterns, it is necessary to generate a null expectation for the relative amount of polymorphism and divergence we expect to observe among sex-specific genes in haplodiploid species, given differences in ploidal environment, sex-limited expression, and their potential role in sexual selection. Here, we derive the theoretical expectation for the rate of evolution of sex-specific genes in haplodiploid species, under the assumption that they experience the same selective environment as genes expressed in both sexes. We find that the null expectation is that reproductive genes evolve more rapidly than constitutively expressed genes in haplodiploid genomes. However, despite the aforementioned differences, the null expectation does not differ between male- and female-specific reproductive genes, when assuming additivity. Our theoretical results provide an important baseline expectation that should be used in molecular evolution studies comparing rates of evolution among classes of genes in haplodiploid species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.