ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
An adaptive direction-assisted test for microbiome compositional data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ensemble test for microbiome data.Microbiome · 2026Article
- A non-parametric U-statistic testing approach for multi-arm clinical trials with multivariate longitudinal data.Journal of multivariate analysis · 2025Article
- CODARFE: Unlocking the prediction of continuous environmental variables based on microbiome.GigaScience · 2025Article
- microBiomeGSM: the identification of taxonomic biomarkers from metagenomic data using grouping, scoring and modeling (G-S-M) approach.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMicrobial communities have been shown to be associated with many complex diseases, such as cancers and cardiovascular diseases. The identification of differentially abundant taxa is clinically important. It can help understand the pathology of complex diseases, and potentially provide preventive and therapeutic strategies. Appropriate differential analyses for microbiome data are challenging due to its unique data characteristics including compositional constraint, excessive zeros and high dimensionality. Most existing approaches either ignore these data characteristics or only account for the compositional constraint by using log-ratio transformations with zero observations replaced by a pseudocount. However, there is no consensus on how to choose a pseudocount. More importantly, ignoring the characteristic of excessive zeros may result in poorly powered analyses and therefore yield misleading findings.
resultsWe develop a novel microbiome-based direction-assisted test for the detection of overall difference in microbial relative abundances between two health conditions, which simultaneously incorporates the characteristics of relative abundance data. The proposed test (i) divides the taxa into two clusters by the directions of mean differences of relative abundances and then combines them at cluster level, in light of the compositional characteristic; and (ii) contains a burden type test, which collapses multiple taxa into a single one to account for excessive zeros. Moreover, the proposed test is an adaptive procedure, which can accommodate high-dimensional settings and yield high power against various alternative hypotheses. We perform extensive simulation studies across a wide range of scenarios to evaluate the proposed test and show its substantial power gain over some existing tests. The superiority of the proposed approach is further demonstrated with real datasets from two microbiome studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package for MiDAT is available at https://github.com/zhangwei0125/MiDAT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.