ArticleJornal de pediatria
Predictors of extubation outcomes among extremely and very preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lung ultrasound aeration score as a predictor of extubation failure in neonates: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Predictors of extubation failure in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Nomogram-based prediction model for extubation failure in preterm infants with invasive mechanical ventilation.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- A nomogram to predict extubation failure in infants born before 32 gestational weeks: a single-center retrospective study.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Predicting extubation failure in neonates: The role of lung ultrasound and corrected gestational age in safe weaning in the NICU.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Feasibility of Endotracheal Extubation Evaluation Form in Predicting Successful Extubation in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the clinical or sociodemographic predictors for both successful and failed extubation among Chinese extremely and very preterm infants
methodsA retrospective cohort study was carried out among extremely and very preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks of gestational age (GA).
resultsCompared with the infants who experienced extubation failure, the successful infants had higher birth weight (OR 0.997; CI 0.996-0.998), higher GA (OR 0.582; 95% CI 0.499-0.678), a caesarean section delivery (OR 0.598; 95% CI 0.380-0.939), a higher five-minute Apgar score (OR 0.501; 95% CI 0.257-0.977), and a higher pH prior to extubation (OR 0.008; 95% CI 0.001-0.058). Failed extubation was associated with older mothers (OR 1.055; 95% CI 1.013-1.099), infants intubated in the delivery room (OR 2.820; 95% CI 1.742-4.563), a higher fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO
conclusionsHigher GA, higher pre-extubation pH, lower pre-extubation FiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.