Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35640590›Full record

ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2022

Endoscopic vein harvesting: a guide for approaching difficult cases and assessing patients preoperatively.

Sadiq Siddiqui, Jack Whooley, Antonio Miceli, Fabio Bartolozzi, Alan Soo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sadiq SiddiquiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Jack WhooleyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2410-005X
Antonio MiceliDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Fabio BartolozziDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Alan SooDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting remains the most commonly performed cardiac surgical procedure worldwide. The long saphenous vein still presides as the first choice conduit as a second graft in multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Traditionally, the long saphenous vein has been harvested with an open approach which can potentially result in significant wound complications in certain circumstances. Endoscopic vein harvesting is a minimally invasive vein harvesting technique, which requires a single 2-3 cm incision and is associated with a quicker return to normal daily activities, decreased wound complications and better quality of life in the longer term. There is a learning curve associated with endoscopic vein harvesting adoption and there are certain patient factors that can prove to be challenging when adopting an endoscopic approach. This commentary aims to provide a concise guide of certain challenging patient factors that operators may encounter during endoscopic vein harvesting, and how to approach these patients in both the preoperative and intraoperative settings. We suggest that with appropriate planning and awareness of the challenging patient factors and problematic venous anatomy that exists, the operator can consistently formulate a strategy for ensuring a successful endoscopic harvest.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTissue and Organ HarvestingCoronary Artery BypassEndoscopyHumansSaphenous VeinCoronary artery bypass graftingEndoscopic vein harvestingLong saphenous veinMinimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID35640590
PMCPMC9486924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.