Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35640553›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Polygenic discrimination of migratory phenotypes in an estuarine forage fish.

Matthew A Campbell, Shannon E K Joslin, Alisha M Goodbla, Malte Willmes, James A Hobbs, Levi S Lewis, Amanda J Finger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew A CampbellGenomic Variation Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5826-0329
Shannon E K JoslinGenomic Variation Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Alisha M GoodblaGenomic Variation Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0416-2069
Malte WillmesInstitute of Marine Sciences, UC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8734-5324
James A HobbsOtolith Geochemistry and Fish Ecology Lab, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4052-9000
Levi S LewisOtolith Geochemistry and Fish Ecology Lab, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9664-9386
Amanda J FingerGenomic Variation Laboratory, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3850-3685
University of California, Davis · USNOAA National Marine Fisheries Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migration is a complex phenotypic trait with some species containing migratory and nonmigratory individuals. Such life history variation may be attributed in part to plasticity, epigenetics, or genetics. Although considered semianadromous, recent studies using otolith geochemistry have revealed life history variation within the critically endangered Delta Smelt. Broadly categorizable as migratory or freshwater residents, we examined Restriction site Associated DNA sequencing data to test for a relationship between genetic variation and migratory behaviors. As previously shown, we found no evidence for neutral population genetic structure within Delta Smelt; however, we found significant evidence for associations between genetic variants and life history phenotypes. Furthermore, discriminant analysis of principal components, hierarchical clustering, and machine learning resulted in accurate assignment of fish into the freshwater resident or migratory classes based on their genotypes. These results suggest the presence of adaptive genetic variants relating to life history variation within a panmictic population. Mechanisms that may lead to this observation are genotype dependent habitat choice and spatially variable selection, both of which could operate each generation and are not exclusive. Given that the population of cultured Delta Smelt are being used as a refugial population for conservation, as a supply for wild population supplementation, and currently represent the majority of all living individuals of this species, we recommend that the hatchery management strategy consider the frequencies of life history-associated alleles and how to maintain this important aspect of Delta Smelt biological variation while under captive propagation.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesOsmeriformesAnimalsFresh WaterPhenotypeSequence Analysis, DNAadaptive genetic variationDelta SmeltmigrationOsmeridaeresident ecotypesemianadromy

Identifiers

PMID35640553
PMCPMC9339312
OpenAlexW4281800979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.