Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35640282›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of surgery2022

Endoscopic vacuum therapy and early surgical closure after pelvic anastomotic leak: meta-analysis of bowel continuity rates.

F Borja de Lacy, Kevin Talboom, Sapho X Roodbeen, Robin Blok, Anna Curell, Pieter J Tanis, Wilhelmus A Bemelman, Roel Hompes

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy: When and How to Use It?GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

F Borja de LacyGastrointestinal Surgery Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1485-7668
Kevin TalboomDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2007-4934
Sapho X RoodbeenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Robin BlokDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anna CurellGastrointestinal Surgery Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pieter J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3146-3310
Wilhelmus A BemelmanDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Roel HompesDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLUniversitat de Barcelona · ESErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) with or without early surgical closure (ESC) is considered an effective option in the management of pelvic anastomotic leakage. This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of EVT in terms of stoma reversal rate and the added value of ESC.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted in November 2021 to identify articles on EVT in adult patients with pelvic anastomotic leakage. The primary outcome was restored continuity rate. Following PRISMA guidelines, a meta-analysis was undertaken using a random-effects model.

resultsTwenty-nine studies were included, accounting for 827 patients with leakage who underwent EVT. There was large heterogeneity between studies in design and reported outcomes, and a high risk of bias. The overall weighted mean restored continuity rate was 66.8 (95 per cent c.i. 58.8 to 73.9) per cent. In patients undergoing EVT with ESC, the calculated restored continuity rate was 82 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 50.1 to 95.4) as compared to 64.7 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 55.7 to 72.7) after EVT without ESC. The mean number of sponge exchanges was 4 (95 per cent c.i. 2.7 to 4.6) and 9.8 (95 per cent c.i. 7.3 to 12.3), respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed a restored continuity rate of 81 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 55.8 to 99.5) for benign disease, 69.0 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 57.3 to 78.7) for colorectal cancer, and 65 per cent (95 per cent c.i. 48.8 to 79.1) if neoadjuvant radiotherapy was given.

conclusionEVT is associated with satisfactory stoma reversal rates that may be improved if it is combined with ESC.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyPelvisAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalEndoscopyHumans

Identifiers

PMID35640282
PMCPMC10364759
OpenAlexW4282916208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.