Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35640253›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2022

Current situation survey for establishing personally acceptable radiation dose limits for nuclear disaster responders.

Keita Iyama, Takeyasu Kakamu, Kazunori Yamashita, Jiro Shimada, Osamu Tasaki, Arifumi Hasegawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keita IyamaDepartment of Radiation Disaster Medicine, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Takeyasu KakamuDepartment of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Kazunori YamashitaAcute and Critical Care Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, 852-8102, Japan.
Jiro ShimadaFutaba Emergency Medical Support Center, Fukushima Medical University, Tomioka, 979-1151, Japan.
Osamu TasakiAcute and Critical Care Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, 852-8102, Japan.
Arifumi HasegawaDepartment of Radiation Disaster Medicine, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Fukushima Medical University · JPNagasaki University Hospital · JPFutaba (Japan) · JP

Funding

Institute for Health Economics and Policy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When responding to disasters, emergency preparedness is essential to ensure that disaster activities are performed smoothly, safely and efficiently. Investigations on the Fukushima accident revealed that lack of preparedness, poor communication and unsuitable emergency measures contributed to an inadequate emergency response to the nuclear disaster. In this study, we conducted a questionnaire survey on the establishment of a personal radiation exposure dose among Disaster Medical Assistance Team (DMAT) members in Japan who might be involved in the initial response to a nuclear disaster. Establishing personal exposure doses for personnel can encourage emergency preparedness and inform decisions on appropriate role assignments during nuclear response activities. Valid responses were obtained from 178 participants, and the response distribution was as follows: 'Already have own acceptable dose standard,' 16 (9%); 'Follow own institution's standard (and know its value),' 30 (17%); 'Follow own institution's standard (but do not know its value),' 59 (33%); 'Haven't decided,' 63 (35%) and 'Don't understand question meaning,' 10 (6%). We also assessed intention to engage in nuclear disaster activities among respondents via engagement intent scores (EIS) and found that participants who had established personal exposure standards had significantly higher EIS scores than those who had not decided or who did not understand the question. Thus, educating potential nuclear disaster responders on personal exposure doses may contribute to a higher intention to engage in emergency responses and improve preparedness and response efficiency.

Indexed as

Disaster PlanningDisastersRadiation ExposureHumansRadiation DosageSurveys and Questionnairesacceptable exposure doseDMATemergency preparednessnuclear disasterradiation

Identifiers

PMID35640253
PMCPMC9303598
OpenAlexW4281732185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.