Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35640102›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2022

The Neuroanatomy of Speech Processing: A Large-scale Lesion Study.

Corianne Rogalsky, Alexandra Basilakos, Chris Rorden, Sara Pillay, Arianna N LaCroix, Lynsey Keator, Soren Mickelsen, Steven W Anderson, Tracy Love, Julius Fridriksson and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Corianne RogalskyArizona State University, Tempe.
Alexandra BasilakosUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia.
Chris RordenUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia.
Sara PillayMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.ORCID 0000-0003-1986-061X
Arianna N LaCroixArizona State University, Tempe.
Lynsey KeatorUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia.
Soren MickelsenArizona State University, Tempe.
Steven W AndersonUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City.
Tracy LoveSan Diego State University, California.
Julius FridrikssonUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia.
Jeffrey BinderMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Gregory HickokUniversity of California, Irvine.
University of South Carolina · USArizona State University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Integrative Functions of the Planum TemporaleR01DC009659 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HICKOK, GREGORY, SABERI, KOUROSH · 2009 to 2020
$5.1M
Interdisciplinary Research Training in Otolaryngology and Communication SciencesT32DC014435 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 2015 to 2024
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009659NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC014435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural basis of language has been studied for centuries, yet the networks critically involved in simply identifying or understanding a spoken word remain elusive. Several functional-anatomical models of critical neural substrates of receptive speech have been proposed, including (1) auditory-related regions in the left mid-posterior superior temporal lobe, (2) motor-related regions in the left frontal lobe (in normal and/or noisy conditions), (3) the left anterior superior temporal lobe, or (4) bilateral mid-posterior superior temporal areas. One difficulty in comparing these models is that they often focus on different aspects of the sound-to-meaning pathway and are supported by different types of stimuli and tasks. Two auditory tasks that are typically used in separate studies-syllable discrimination and word comprehension-often yield different conclusions. We assessed syllable discrimination (words and nonwords) and word comprehension (clear speech and with a noise masker) in 158 individuals with focal brain damage: left (n = 113) or right (n = 19) hemisphere stroke, left (n = 18) or right (n = 8) anterior temporal lobectomy, and 26 neurologically intact controls. Discrimination and comprehension tasks are doubly dissociable both behaviorally and neurologically. In support of a bilateral model, clear speech comprehension was near ceiling in 95% of left stroke cases and right temporal damage impaired syllable discrimination. Lesion-symptom mapping analyses for the syllable discrimination and noisy word comprehension tasks each implicated most of the left superior temporal gyrus. Comprehension but not discrimination tasks also implicated the left posterior middle temporal gyrus, whereas discrimination but not comprehension tasks also implicated more dorsal sensorimotor regions in posterior perisylvian cortex.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionStrokeBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroanatomySpeechTemporal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID35640102
PMCPMC9274306
OpenAlexW4281644510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.