Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35640085›Full record

ArticleDental press journal of orthodontics2021

Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion.

Ildeu Andrade, Marco Aurélio Benini Paschoal, Natália Couto Figueiredo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of time between archwire changes on intended dentoalveolar expansion in orthodontic patients treated with fixed appliances : A prospective controlled clinical trial.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ildeu AndradeMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Orthodontics (Charleston/SC, USA).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-2627
Marco Aurélio Benini PaschoalUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Saúde Bucal da Criança e do Adolescente (Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3396-4688
Natália Couto FigueiredoPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais Departamento de Ortodontia, (Belo Horizonte/MG, Brazil).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6591-4872
Medical University of South Carolina · USPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDue to the anatomical constraints of the mandible, mandibular dental arch usually serves as a guideline to determine the required changes in the maxillary transverse dimension. The Schwarz appliance and the Lip Bumper are the traditional orthodontic appliances for mandibular arch expansion in patients with borderline amounts of crowding, and/or transverse discrepancy. However, they often require patient cooperation, which may be a concern for orthodontists in daily practice.

objectivesThis article illustrates a simple fixed orthodontic device as an alternative to achieve mandibular arch expansion in patients with moderate tooth-size/arch-length discrepancy. The four reported cases refer to 8 to 10-year-old patients in the mixed dentition, with an Angle Class I or Class II malocclusion, transverse deficiency in both arches, moderate crowding and/or posterior crossbite, combined with compromised smile aesthetics. The patients were treated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using Hass expander appliance and the modified Arnold expander (MAE).

conclusionThis low-cost compliance-free orthodontic appliance provided dentoalveolar decompensation by means of uprighting the posterior teeth, with minimal or no adjustments during treatment. The final results were achieved in only three to four months, and fulfilled all treatment objectives, such as an increase in the arch perimeter and width, and a better teeth alignment.

Indexed as

Dental ArchMalocclusionDentition, MixedEsthetics, DentalHumansPalatal Expansion Technique

Identifiers

PMID35640085
PMCPMC8576860
OpenAlexW3208032365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.