Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639978›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

A Population-Genetic Lens into the Process of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication.

Parul Johri, Jean-Francois Gout, Thomas G Doak, Michael Lynch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Autophagy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Gene and Genome Duplication in Spiders.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Diploidization in a wild rice allopolyploid is both episodic and gradual.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Annual review of genetics · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Parul JohriSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Jean-Francois GoutDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Thomas G DoakDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Michael LynchCenter for Mechanisms of Evolution, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Arizona State University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USMississippi State University · US

Funding

Causes and Population-genetic Consequences of Molecular VariationR35GM122566 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Michael R LYNCH · 2017 to 2026
$7.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome duplications (WGDs) have occurred in many eukaryotic lineages. However, the underlying evolutionary forces and molecular mechanisms responsible for the long-term retention of gene duplicates created by WGDs are not well understood. We employ a population-genomic approach to understand the selective forces acting on paralogs and investigate ongoing duplicate-gene loss in multiple species of Paramecium that share an ancient WGD. We show that mutations that abolish protein function are more likely to be segregating in retained WGD paralogs than in single-copy genes, most likely because of ongoing nonfunctionalization post-WGD. This relaxation of purifying selection occurs in only one WGD paralog, accompanied by the gradual fixation of nonsynonymous mutations and reduction in levels of expression, and occurs over a long period of evolutionary time, "marking" one locus for future loss. Concordantly, the fitness effects of new nonsynonymous mutations and frameshift-causing indels are significantly more deleterious in the highly expressed copy compared with their paralogs with lower expression. Our results provide a novel mechanistic model of gene duplicate loss following WGDs, wherein selection acts on the sum of functional activity of both duplicate genes, allowing the two to wander in expression and functional space, until one duplicate locus eventually degenerates enough in functional efficiency or expression that its contribution to total activity is too insignificant to be retained by purifying selection. Retention of duplicates by such mechanisms predicts long times to duplicate-gene loss, which should not be falsely attributed to retention due to gain/change in function.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationParameciumEvolution, MolecularGenes, DuplicateGenomedistribution of fitness effectsloss-of-function mutationsnonfunctionalizationParameciumwhole-genome duplications

Identifiers

PMID35639978
PMCPMC9206413
OpenAlexW4282941452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.