Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639946›Full record

Trial reportBJS open2022

Effect of local anaesthetic infiltration on postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: randomized clinical trial.

Wikran Suragul, Apawee Tantawanit, Narongsak Rungsakulkij, Paramin Muangkaew, Pongsatorn Tangtawee, Somkit Mingphrudhi, Watoo Vassanasiri, Panuwat Lertsithichai, Suraida Aeesoa, Worapot Apinyachon

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Optimizing Anesthetic Management for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wikran SuragulDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Apawee TantawanitDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narongsak RungsakulkijDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Paramin MuangkaewDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pongsatorn TangtaweeDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Somkit MingphrudhiDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Watoo VassanasiriDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Panuwat LertsithichaiDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suraida AeesoaDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worapot ApinyachonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THRamathibodi Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal anaesthetic infiltration is widely used to reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This trial evaluated the effect of depth of local anaesthetic infiltration on postoperative pain reduction after LC.

methodsPatients undergoing elective LC between March 2018 and February 2019 were randomized into no infiltration, subcutaneous infiltration, and rectus sheath infiltration using bupivacaine. The primary outcome was 24-h postoperative cumulative morphine use, and the secondary outcomes were mean 24-h Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, and nausea, and vomiting. Subgroups were compared and multivariable analyses were performed.

resultsOut of 170 eligible patients, 162 were selected and 150 patients were analysed: 48 in the no-infiltration group, 50 in the subcutaneous infiltration group, and 52 in the rectus sheath infiltration group. The groups had similar clinical features, although mean BMI was higher in the subcutaneous infiltration group (P = 0.001). The 24-h cumulative morphine use in the rectus sheath infiltration group was significantly lower than in the no-infiltration group (P = 0.043), but no difference was observed between the subcutaneous infiltration and no-infiltration groups (P = 0.999). One hour after surgery, the rectus sheath infiltration group had a significantly lower NRS score than the no-infiltration and subcutaneous infiltration groups respectively (P = 0.006 and P = 0.031); however, the score did not differ among the three groups at any of the time points from 2 h after the surgery. The incidence of nausea or vomiting was comparable among the three groups. Multivariable analysis documented that a lower dose of morphine use was associated with rectus sheath infiltration (P = 0.004) and diabetes (P = 0.001); whereas, increased morphine use was associate with age (P = 0.040) and a longer duration of surgery (P = 0.007).

conclusionsLocal anaesthetic infiltration into the rectus sheath reduced postoperative cumulative morphine use and the immediate NRS score in patients undergoing LC; however, the pain scores were comparable 2 h after surgery. REGISTRATION NUMBER: TCTR20201103002 (http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org).

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicAnesthetics, LocalHumansMorphine DerivativesNauseaPostoperative PainVomitingAnesthetics, LocalMorphine Derivatives

Identifiers

PMID35639946
PMCPMC9154337
OpenAlexW4226396045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.