Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639805›Full record

ReviewAesthetic surgery journal2022

2022 Practice Recommendation Updates From the World Consensus Conference on BIA-ALCL.

Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo, Mark W Clemens, Michael Atlan, Giovanni Botti, Peter G Cordeiro, Daphne De Jong, Arianna Di Napoli, Dennis Hammond, Cara L Haymaker, Steven M Horwitz and 9 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Update on Implant-Associated Malignancies and Their Biocompatibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Fabio Santanelli di PompeoFaculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Department NESMOS, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1217-3668
Mark W ClemensDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA and is a Breast Surgery section editor for Aesthetic Surgery Journal.
Michael AtlanAesthetic Plastic Reconstructive Unit/CHU TENON PARIS-APHP, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Giovanni Botti
Peter G CordeiroPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daphne De JongAmsterdam UMC-Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Arianna Di NapoliPathology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Dennis Hammond
Cara L HaymakerDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Steven M HorwitzLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kelly HuntDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Peter LennoxDepartment of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada and is a clinical editor for Aesthetic Surgery Journal.
Patrick Mallucci
Roberto N MirandaDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8467-5464
Alexandre M MunhozPlastic Surgery Department, Hospital Moriah, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Higienópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eric Swanson
Suzanne D TurnerDivision of Cellular and Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8439-4507
Guido FirmaniFaculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Plastic Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5806-1530
Michail SorotosFaculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Department NESMOS, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4822-3794

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaboratory and clinical research on breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is rapidly evolving. Changes in standard of care and insights into best practice were recently presented at the 3rd World Consensus Conference on BIA-ALCL.

objectivesThe authors sought to provide practice recommendations from a consensus of experts, supplemented with a literature review regarding epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, socio-psychological aspects, and international authority guidance.

methodsA literature search of all manuscripts between 1997 and August 2021 for the above areas of BIA-ALCL was conducted with the PubMed database. Manuscripts in different languages, on non-human subjects, and/or discussing conditions separate from BIA-ALCL were excluded. The study was conducted employing the Delphi process, gathering 18 experts panelists and utilizing email-based questionnaires to record the level of agreement with each statement by applying a 5-point Likert Scale. Median response, interquartile range, and comments were employed to accept, reject, or revise each statement.

resultsThe literature search initially yielded 764 manuscripts, of which 405 were discarded. From the remaining 359, only 218 were included in the review and utilized to prepare 36 statements subdivided into 5 sections. After 1 round, panelists agreed on all criteria.

conclusionsBIA-ALCL is uncommon and still largely underreported. Mandatory implant registries and actions by regulatory authorities are needed to better understand disease epidemiology and address initial lymphomagenesis and progression. Deviation from current diagnosis and treatment protocols can lead to disease recurrence, and research on breast implant risk factors provide insight to etiology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4:

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsLymphoma, Large-Cell, AnaplasticFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35639805
PMCPMC9924046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.