Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639792›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2022

High-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D supplementation in older adults with COVID-19 (COVIT-TRIAL): A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial.

Cédric Annweiler, Mélinda Beaudenon, Jennifer Gautier, Justine Gonsard, Sophie Boucher, Guillaume Chapelet, Astrid Darsonval, Bertrand Fougère, Olivier Guérin, Marjorie Houvet and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04344041 (COvid-19 and Vitamin D Supplementation), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04344041 phase3completednot on this map

COvid-19 and Vitamin D Supplementation: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of High Dose Versus Standard Dose Vitamin D3 in High-risk COVID-19 Patients (CoVitTrial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AngersRan2020 to 2021Enrolled260ConditionsCoronavirusArmscholecalciferol 200,000 IU, cholecalciferol 50,000 IU
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Cédric AnnweilerDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Centre on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France; UNIV Angers, UPRES EA 4638, University of Angers, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7199-8109
Mélinda BeaudenonDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Centre on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France; UNIV Angers, UPRES EA 4638, University of Angers, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2898-0325
Jennifer GautierDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Centre on Autonomy and Longevity, University Hospital, Angers, France; UNIV Angers, UPRES EA 4638, University of Angers, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0200-9378
Justine GonsardDelegation for Clinical Research and Innovation, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Sophie BoucherDepartment of ENT Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Angers, France; MitoLab Team Mitochondrial Medecine Research Centre, MitoVasc Intitute, UNIV Angers, CNRS UMR6015, INSERM U1083, University of Angers, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-0901
Guillaume ChapeletDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Memory Clinic, Research Centre, University Hospital, Nantes, France; Inserm UMR1235, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
Astrid DarsonvalDepartment of Pharmacy, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Bertrand FougèreDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France; Education, Ethics, Health (EA 7505), Tours University, Tours, France.
Olivier GuérinUniversité Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Service de Médecine Gériatrique et Thérapeutique, Nice, France; Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS UMR 7284/INSERM U108, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging Nice (IRCAN), Faculté de Médecine, Nice, France.
Marjorie HouvetDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, General Hospital, Saumur, France.
Pierre MénagerDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, General Hospital, Le Mans, France.
Claire Roubaud-BaudronPôle de Gérontologie Clinique, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; INSERM 1053, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-0979
Achille TchallaUnité de Recherche Clinique et d'Innovation (URCI) de Gérontologie, Pôle HU Gérontologie Clinique, CHU de Limoges, France; Université de Limoges, IFR GEIST, Laboratoire UR Vie-Santé (Aging and Digital health Lab) Faculté de Medicine de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Jean-Claude SouberbielleService des Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Jérémie RiouDelegation for Clinical Research and Innovation, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7056-9257
Elsa Parot-SchinkelDelegation for Clinical Research and Innovation, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Thomas CélarierDepartment of Clinical Gerontology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France; Chaire Santé des Ainés, University of Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
COVIT-TRIAL study group
Université d'Angers · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier du Mans · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D supplementation has been proposed as a treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on experimental data and data from small and uncontrolled observational studies. The COvid19 and VITamin d TRIAL (COVIT-TRIAL) study was conducted to test whether a single oral high dose of cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) administered within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19 improves, compared to standard-dose cholecalciferol, the 14-day overall survival among at-risk older adults infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS AND

findingsThis multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, superiority trial involved collaboration of 9 medical centers in France. Patients admitted to the hospital units or living in nursing homes adjacent to the investigator centers were eligible if they were ≥65 years, had SARS-CoV-2 infection of less than 3 days, and at least 1 COVID-19 worsening risk factor (among age ≥75 years, SpO2 ≤94%, or PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mm Hg). Main noninclusion criteria were organ failure requiring ICU, SpO2 ≤92% despite 5 L/min oxygen, life expectancy <3 months, vitamin D supplementation >800 IU/day during the preceding month, and contraindications to vitamin D supplements. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either a single oral high-dose (400,000 IU) or standard-dose (50,000 IU) cholecalciferol administered under medical supervision within 72 hours after the diagnosis of COVID-19. Participants and local study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but the Steering Committee and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board were masked to the randomization group and outcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 14-day overall mortality. Between April 15 and December 17, 2020, of 1,207 patients who were assessed for eligibility in the COVIT-TRIAL study, 254 met eligibility criteria and formed the intention-to-treat population. The median age was 88 (IQR, 82 to 92) years, and 148 patients (58%) were women. Overall, 8 (6%) of 127 patients allocated to high-dose cholecalciferol, and 14 (11%) of 127 patients allocated to standard-dose cholecalciferol died within 14 days (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.39 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.99], P = 0.049, after controlling for randomization strata [i.e., age, oxygen requirement, hospitalization, use of antibiotics, anti-infective drugs, and/or corticosteroids] and baseline imbalances in important prognostic factors [i.e., sex, ongoing cancers, profuse diarrhea, and delirium at baseline]). The number needed to treat for one person to benefit (NNTB) was 21 [NNTB 9 to ∞ to number needed to treat for one person to harm (NNTH) 46]. Apparent benefits were also found on 14-day mortality due to COVID-19 (7 (6%) deaths in high-dose group and 14 (11%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.86], P = 0.02). The protective effect of the single oral high-dose administration was not sustained at 28 days (19 (15%) deaths in high-dose group and 21 (17%) deaths in standard-dose group; adjusted hazard ratio = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.36], P = 0.29). High-dose cholecalciferol did not result in more frequent adverse effects compared to the standard dose. The open-label design and limited study power are the main limitations of the study.

conclusionsIn this randomized controlled trial (RCT), we observed that the early administration of high-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D3 to at-risk older patients with COVID-19 improved overall mortality at day 14. The effect was no longer observed after 28 days.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04344041.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentVitamin DAgedAged, 80 and overCholecalciferolDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleOxygenSARS-CoV-2CholecalciferolOxygenVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID35639792
PMCPMC9154122
OpenAlexW4282919145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.