Trial reportPloS one2022
Citicoline in acute ischemic stroke: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical studies of conditioned medium of hypoxic-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cell/hypMSC-CM for ischemic stroke: A systematic review.Open veterinary journal · 2026Pooled it
- The efficacy of different doses of citicoline in improving the prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke based on network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy analysis of neuroprotective drugs in patients with acute ischemic stroke based on network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic-search-and-review of registered pharmacological therapies investigated to improve neuro-recovery after a stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Cytoprotection Concepts for Ischemic Stroke in the Recanalization Era.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- The effect of citicoline administration on visual function improvement in stroke patients at Prof. Dr. Chairuddin Panusunan Lubis Hospital, University of Sumatera Utara, and affiliated network hospitals.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Neuroprotective effects of kojic acid and nano-kojic acid in experimental brain ischemia induced by bilateral common carotid artery occlusion.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Neuroprotection beyond intraocular pressure: game changer or quiet addiction.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Current neuroprotective agents in stroke.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024Review
- Influence of the brain‑gut axis on neuroinflammation in cerebral ischemia‑reperfusion injury (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Choline-Containing Phospholipids in Stroke Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Citicoline: pharmacological and clinical review, 2022 update.Revista de neurologia · 2022Review
- Endogenous defense mechanism-based neuroprotection in large-vessel acute ischemic stroke: A hope for future.Brain circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTwo pharmacological possibilities exist for an acute ischemic stroke (AIS): recanalization of the occluded artery and neuroprotection from ischaemic injury, the latter's efficacy being debatable. We sought to determine whether administration of Citicoline immediately after recanalization therapy for AIS would improve clinical and radiological outcome at three months compared to standard treatment alone. PATIENTS AND
methodsCAISR was a single centre, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with blinded endpoint assessment. It was approved by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Institutional ethics committee and registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2018/011900). We recruited participants with AIS undergoing recanalization therapy and randomly assigned them to receive either Citicoline or placebo in 1:1 ratio. Citicoline arm patients received Citicoline 1gm BD intravenously for three days, followed by oral citicoline 1gm BD for 39 days. Placebo arm patients received 100ml intravenous normal saline for three days, followed by multivitamin tablet BD for 39 days. All patients received standard of care. OUTCOME: Blinded assessors did the follow-up assessment at six weeks (MRI Brain-stroke volume) and three months (NIHSS 0-2, mRS 0-2 and Barthel index> = 95).
resultsThe infarct volume decreased from week 1 to week 6 by 2.6 cm3 on placebo versus 4.2 cm3 on Citicoline (p-0.483). The OR for achieving NIHSS 0-2, mRS 0-2 and Barthel index> = 95 with Citicoline was found to be 0.96(95%CI 0.39-2.40), 0.92(95%CI 0.40-2.05) and 0.87(95%CI 0.22-2.98) respectively.
conclusionCAISR was the first to evaluate the role of Citicoline, when used immediately after recanalization therapy, when the penumbral tissue is the most susceptible either to be protected from injury or become ischemic. We did not find any significant difference between the Citicoline or placebo arms with respect to either our primary or secondary outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.