Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639720›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Citicoline in acute ischemic stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

Ayush Agarwal, Venugopalan Y Vishnu, Jyoti Sharma, Rohit Bhatia, Ajay Garg, Sadanand Dwivedi, Ashish Upadhyay, Vinay Goyal, Mamta Bhushan Singh, Anu Gupta and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Cytoprotection Concepts for Ischemic Stroke in the Recanalization Era.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neuroprotection beyond intraocular pressure: game changer or quiet addiction.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  10. Current neuroprotective agents in stroke.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayush AgarwalDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2303-1961
Venugopalan Y VishnuDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Jyoti SharmaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rohit BhatiaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ajay GargDepartment of Neuroradiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sadanand DwivediDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashish UpadhyayDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Vinay GoyalDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mamta Bhushan SinghDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Anu GuptaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Roopa RajanDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
M V Padma SrivastavaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7615-9411
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwo pharmacological possibilities exist for an acute ischemic stroke (AIS): recanalization of the occluded artery and neuroprotection from ischaemic injury, the latter's efficacy being debatable. We sought to determine whether administration of Citicoline immediately after recanalization therapy for AIS would improve clinical and radiological outcome at three months compared to standard treatment alone. PATIENTS AND

methodsCAISR was a single centre, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with blinded endpoint assessment. It was approved by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Institutional ethics committee and registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2018/011900). We recruited participants with AIS undergoing recanalization therapy and randomly assigned them to receive either Citicoline or placebo in 1:1 ratio. Citicoline arm patients received Citicoline 1gm BD intravenously for three days, followed by oral citicoline 1gm BD for 39 days. Placebo arm patients received 100ml intravenous normal saline for three days, followed by multivitamin tablet BD for 39 days. All patients received standard of care. OUTCOME: Blinded assessors did the follow-up assessment at six weeks (MRI Brain-stroke volume) and three months (NIHSS 0-2, mRS 0-2 and Barthel index> = 95).

resultsThe infarct volume decreased from week 1 to week 6 by 2.6 cm3 on placebo versus 4.2 cm3 on Citicoline (p-0.483). The OR for achieving NIHSS 0-2, mRS 0-2 and Barthel index> = 95 with Citicoline was found to be 0.96(95%CI 0.39-2.40), 0.92(95%CI 0.40-2.05) and 0.87(95%CI 0.22-2.98) respectively.

conclusionCAISR was the first to evaluate the role of Citicoline, when used immediately after recanalization therapy, when the penumbral tissue is the most susceptible either to be protected from injury or become ischemic. We did not find any significant difference between the Citicoline or placebo arms with respect to either our primary or secondary outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeStrokeCytidine Diphosphate CholineDouble-Blind MethodHumansIschemiaCytidine Diphosphate Choline

Identifiers

PMID35639720
PMCPMC9154187
OpenAlexW4281678204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.