Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639693›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Retrotransposition facilitated the establishment of a primary plastid in the thecate amoeba

Victoria Calatrava, Timothy G Stephens, Arwa Gabr, Devaki Bhaya, Debashish Bhattacharya, Arthur R Grossman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evidence of a putative COEnvironmental microbiology reports · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria CalatravaDepartment of Plant Biology, The Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-6323-5793
Timothy G StephensDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.ORCID 0000-0003-1554-7175
Arwa GabrGraduate Program in Molecular Biosciences, Program in Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Devaki BhayaDepartment of Plant Biology, The Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0001-7965-4258
Debashish BhattacharyaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901.ORCID 0000-0003-0611-1273
Arthur R GrossmanDepartment of Plant Biology, The Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-3747-5881
Carnegie Institution for Science · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of eukaryotic life was predicated on the development of organelles such as mitochondria and plastids. During this complex process of organellogenesis, the host cell and the engulfed prokaryote became genetically codependent, with the integration of genes from the endosymbiont into the host nuclear genome and subsequent gene loss from the endosymbiont. This process required that horizontally transferred genes become active and properly regulated despite inherent differences in genetic features between donor (endosymbiont) and recipient (host). Although this genetic reorganization is considered critical for early stages of organellogenesis, we have little knowledge about the mechanisms governing this process. The photosynthetic amoeba Paulinella micropora offers a unique opportunity to study early evolutionary events associated with organellogenesis and primary endosymbiosis. This amoeba harbors a “chromatophore,” a nascent photosynthetic organelle derived from a relatively recent cyanobacterial association (∼120 million years ago) that is independent of the evolution of primary plastids in plants (initiated ∼1.5 billion years ago). Analysis of the genome and transcriptome of Paulinella revealed that retrotransposition of endosymbiont-derived nuclear genes was critical for their domestication in the host. These retrocopied genes involved in photoprotection in cyanobacteria became expanded gene families and were “rewired,” acquiring light-responsive regulatory elements that function in the host. The establishment of host control of endosymbiont-derived genes likely enabled the cell to withstand photo-oxidative stress generated by oxygenic photosynthesis in the nascent organelle. These results provide insights into the genetic mechanisms and evolutionary pressures that facilitated the metabolic integration of the host–endosymbiont association and sustained the evolution of a photosynthetic organelle.

Indexed as

AmoebaBiological EvolutionRhizariaSymbiosisEukaryotaPlastidsendosymbiotic gene transfergene domesticationhigh light–inducibleorganellogenesisprimary endosymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID35639693
PMCPMC9191642
OpenAlexW4282926330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.