Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639660›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2022

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the ORBITA trial.

Sashiananthan Ganesananthan, Christopher A Rajkumar, Michael Foley, David Thompson, Alexandra N Nowbar, Henry Seligman, Ricardo Petraco, Sayan Sen, Sukhjinder Nijjer, Simon A Thom and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of FFR and CPET in patients withFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The association between OInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sashiananthan GanesananthanNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7503-7527
Christopher A RajkumarNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.
Michael FoleyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0330-5542
David ThompsonUniversity College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0850-7784
Alexandra N NowbarNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.
Henry SeligmanNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4244-860X
Ricardo PetracoNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7912-5492
Sayan SenNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.
Sukhjinder NijjerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9146-1037
Simon A ThomNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3020-1351
Roland WenselNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.
John DaviesEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon.
Darrel FrancisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3410-0814
Matthew Shun-ShinNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1179-0867
James HowardNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9989-6331
Rasha Al-LameeNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road W12 0HS, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3752-5532
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBEssex Cardiothoracic Centre · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/46/28861British Heart Foundation FS/14/27/30752British Heart Foundation FS/ICRF/22/26039Medical Research Council MR/S021108/1Medical Research Council MR/V001620/1Wellcome Trust 212183/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsOxygen-pulse morphology and gas exchange analysis measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has been associated with myocardial ischaemia. The aim of this analysis was to examine the relationship between CPET parameters, myocardial ischaemia and anginal symptoms in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and to determine the ability of these parameters to predict the placebo-controlled response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND

resultsPatients with severe single-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) were randomized 1:1 to PCI or placebo in the ORBITA trial. Subjects underwent pre-randomization treadmill CPET, dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and symptom assessment. These assessments were repeated at the end of a 6-week blinded follow-up period.A total of 195 patients with CPET data were randomized (102 PCI, 93 placebo). Patients in whom an oxygen-pulse plateau was observed during CPET had higher (more ischaemic) DSE score [+0.82 segments; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.40 to 1.25, P = 0.0068] and lower fractional flow reserve (-0.07; 95% CI: -0.12 to -0.02, P = 0.011) compared with those without. At lower (more abnormal) oxygen-pulse slopes, there was a larger improvement of the placebo-controlled effect of PCI on DSE score [oxygen-pulse plateau presence (Pinteraction = 0.026) and oxygen-pulse gradient (Pinteraction = 0.023)] and Seattle angina physical-limitation score [oxygen-pulse plateau presence (Pinteraction = 0.037)]. Impaired peak VO2, VE/VCO2 slope, peak oxygen-pulse, and oxygen uptake efficacy slope was significantly associated with higher symptom burden but did not relate to severity of ischaemia or predict response to PCI.

conclusionAlthough selected CPET parameters relate to severity of angina symptoms and quality of life, only an oxygen-pulse plateau detects the severity of myocardial ischaemia and predicts the placebo-controlled efficacy of PCI in patients with single-vessel CAD.

Indexed as

Angina, StableCoronary Artery DiseaseFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialPercutaneous Coronary InterventionExercise TestHumansOxygenOxygen ConsumptionQuality of LifeOxygenAnginaCardiopulmonary exercise testingChronic coronary syndromeIschaemiaOxygen pulsePeak oxygen uptakeStable coronary artery disease

Identifiers

PMID35639660
PMCPMC9433310
OpenAlexW4281759507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.