ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2022
Germany Endometriosis Pattern Changes; Prevalence and Therapy over 2010 and 2019 Years: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adherence, Acceptability, and Sexual Health Outcomes of the Odeya App-Based Intervention for Sexual Distress in Women With Endometriosis: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Presumed Hippocampal Endometriosis Presenting as Catamenial Epilepsy: Diagnostic Challenges, MRI Follow-Up, and Comparative Review of Reported Cerebral Endometriosis Case.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Patient satisfaction regarding medical care for endometriosis in Germany: an exploratory cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Prevalence of and Factors Associated with Antibiotic Prescription in Gynecological Practices in Germany.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Global and regional trends in the burden of surgically confirmed endometriosis from 1990 to 2021.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
- Endometriosis: Challenges in Clinical Molecular Diagnostics and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Current treatments for endometriosis in South Korea: an analysis of nationwide data from 2010 to 2019.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the prevalence and the therapy patterns of endometriosis differ in 2010 and 2019. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on the data from the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database and included women with at least one visit to one of the 136 private gynecologist practices in Germany in 2010 or 2019. The prevalence of endometriosis as well as prevalence of each endometriosis therapy such as Dienogest, other Progestins than Dienogest, and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormones, was calculated in both years. Results: The present study included 346,249 women documented in 2010 and 343,486 women documented in 2019. The prevalence of endometriosis increased from 0.53% in 2010 to 0.66% in 2019 (P<0.001). The proportion of endometriosis patients treated with Dienogest increased significantly between 2010 and 2019 (18.1 vs. 35.0%). The proportion of women prescribed other Progestins than Dienogest has not significantly changed between 2010 and 2019 (8.4 vs. 8.3%). Gonadotropin-releasing hormones were prescribed only rarely in both 2010 and 2019, with a significant decrease in prescriptions between these two years (3.7 vs. 2.0%). Conclusion: There were significant changes in the prevalence and medical therapeutic patterns of endometriosis in 2010 versus 2019 reflecting changes in therapy guidelines and possibly in diagnostic methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.