Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639602›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Clinical Safety Experience of TAK-003 for Dengue Fever: A New Tetravalent Live Attenuated Vaccine Candidate.

Sanjay S Patel, Martina Rauscher, Maria Kudela, Hang Pang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06891950 (Phase 3B, Double-blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Non-inferiority of the Humoral Immune Response of the Butantan Dengue Vaccine in Participants Aged 60 to 79 Years Compared to Participants Aged 40 to 59 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06891950 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Phase 3B, Double-blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Non-inferiority of the Humoral Immune Response of the Butantan Dengue Vaccine in Participants Aged 60 to 79 Years Compared to Participants Aged 40 to 59 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorButantan InstituteRan2026 to 2027Enrolled997ConditionsDengueArmsDengue 1,2,3,4 (attenuated) vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of a Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine in Children and Adolescents: An Analysis by Age Group.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The Tolerability of the Dengue Vaccine TAK-003 (QdengaTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Recommendations for dengue vaccine implementation in the elderly population.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sanjay S PatelTakeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martina RauscherTakeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maria KudelaTakeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Hang PangTakeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Takeda (Switzerland) · CHTakeda (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn unmet medical need remains for an effective dengue tetravalent vaccine that can be administered irrespective of previous dengue exposure. TAK-003, a dengue tetravalent vaccine, has demonstrated efficacy in an ongoing phase 3 trial in children and adolescents living in dengue-endemic areas, with an acceptable safety profile in both dengue-naive and dengue-exposed individuals.

methodsSafety findings are presented herein from an integrated analysis of data for healthy 4-60-year-olds from two phase 2 and three phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of TAK-003 (TAK-003, n = 14 627; placebo, n = 7167). Safety evaluation included analyses of postinjection reactogenicity, unsolicited adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and deaths. Subgroup analyses were performed by age group, baseline serostatus, and gender.

resultsThe most common local and systemic AEs were injection site pain (43% for TAK-003 and 26% for placebo) and headache (34% and 30%, respectively). Injection site AEs were mostly mild and resolved within 1-3 days. Unsolicited AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation occurred with similar frequency across both groups, while SAEs were fewer for TAK-003 recipients (6% vs 8% for placebo). Four of the 5 vaccine-related SAEs (which included hypersensitivity, dengue fever, and dengue hemorrhagic fever) occurred in the placebo group. No deaths were considered vaccine-related. Subgroup analyses showed no differences in safety by baseline serostatus or by gender, albeit analysis by age indicated greater local reactogenicity rates for adolescents (46% for TAK-003 and 28% for placebo) and adults (56% and 19%, respectively) than for children (37% and 25%, respectively).

conclusionsNo important safety risks were identified, and TAK-003 was well tolerated irrespective of age, gender, or baseline dengue serostatus in recipients aged 4-60 years.

Indexed as

DengueDengue VaccinesAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodHumansMiddle AgedVaccines, AttenuatedYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralDengue VaccinesVaccines, Attenuatedadverse eventsclinical safetydengue tetravalent vaccinehospitalizationTAK-003

Identifiers

PMID35639602
PMCPMC9907483
OpenAlexW4281729991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.