Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639557›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2022

Increased Belief Instability in Psychotic Disorders Predicts Treatment Response to Metacognitive Training.

D J Hauke, V Roth, P Karvelis, R A Adams, S Moritz, S Borgwardt, A O Diaconescu, C Andreou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

D J HaukeDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1772-9239
V RothDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
P KarvelisKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
R A AdamsCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7661-8881
S MoritzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
S BorgwardtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Translational Psychiatry Unit, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
A O DiaconescuKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Canada.
C AndreouDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Translational Psychiatry Unit, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/S007806/1Swiss National Science Foundation 200054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisIn a complex world, gathering information and adjusting our beliefs about the world is of paramount importance. The literature suggests that patients with psychotic disorders display a tendency to draw early conclusions based on limited evidence, referred to as the jumping-to-conclusions bias, but few studies have examined the computational mechanisms underlying this and related belief-updating biases. Here, we employ a computational approach to understand the relationship between jumping-to-conclusions, psychotic disorders, and delusions. STUDY

designWe modeled probabilistic reasoning of 261 patients with psychotic disorders and 56 healthy controls during an information sampling task-the fish task-with the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter. Subsequently, we examined the clinical utility of this computational approach by testing whether computational parameters, obtained from fitting the model to each individual's behavior, could predict treatment response to Metacognitive Training using machine learning. STUDY

resultsWe observed differences in probabilistic reasoning between patients with psychotic disorders and healthy controls, participants with and without jumping-to-conclusions bias, but not between patients with low and high current delusions. The computational analysis suggested that belief instability was increased in patients with psychotic disorders. Jumping-to-conclusions was associated with both increased belief instability and greater prior uncertainty. Lastly, belief instability predicted treatment response to Metacognitive Training at the individual level.

conclusionsOur results point towards increased belief instability as a key computational mechanism underlying probabilistic reasoning in psychotic disorders. We provide a proof-of-concept that this computational approach may be useful to help identify suitable treatments for individual patients with psychotic disorders.

Indexed as

MetacognitionPsychotic DisordersDelusionsHumansProblem Solvingbelief updatingHierarchical Gaussian Filterjumping-to-conclusionsprobabilistic reasoningpsychosistreatment response prediction

Identifiers

PMID35639557
PMCPMC9212107
OpenAlexW4214618720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.