Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639515›Full record

ReviewClinical implant dentistry and related research2022

Implications of considering peri-implant bone loss a disease, a narrative review.

Tomas Albrektsson, Pentti Tengvall, Luis Amengual-Peñafiel, Pierluigi Coli, Georgios Kotsakis, David L Cochran

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Risk factors of bone loss after Prestige-LP cervical disc arthroplasty.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Tomas AlbrektssonDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-0157
Pentti TengvallDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Luis Amengual-PeñafielDental Implantology Unit, Hospital Leonardo Guzmán, Antofagasta, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2183-2140
Pierluigi ColiSpecialist in Periodontics and Prosthodontics, Edinburgh Dental Specialists, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5484-7317
Georgios KotsakisDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
David L CochranDepartment of Periodontology, University of Texas, San Antonio, USA.
University of Gothenburg · SEHospital Regional de Antofagasta · CLNewcastle Dental Hospital · GBThe University of Texas at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeri-implantitis has been suggested to cause significant increasing proportions of implant failure with increasing time. PURPOSE: To assess whether implant failure rates in long term studies are matching the supposed high prevalence of peri-implantitis. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis paper is written as a narrative review of the long-term clinical investigations available in the literature.

resultsSome implant systems have seen unacceptable marginal bone loss figures with time coupled to increased implant failure rates, resulting in the withdrawal of these systems. The reasons for such mishap are generally unknown, with the exception of one system failure that was found to be due to improper clinical handling. Modern, moderately rough implant systems have functioned excellently over 10-15 years of follow up with minor problems with marginal bone loss and implant failure rates within a few per cent. Machined implants have functioned adequately over 20-30 years of follow up. Implant failures occur predominantly during the first few years after implant placement. No significant increase of implant failures has been observed thereafter over 20-30 years of follow up. Over the years of our new millennium, scientific and technical advances have allowed the discovery of numerous molecular pathways and cellular interactions between the skeletal and immune system promoting the development of the interdisciplinary field called osteoimmunology. Nowadays, this knowledge has not only allowed the emergence of new etiologic paradigms for bone disease but also a new dynamic approach on the concept of osseointegration and MBL around oral implants, re-evaluating our older disease oriented outlook. This facilitates at the same time the emergence of translational applications with immunological perspectives, scientific approaches based on omics sciences, and the beginning of an era of personalized dental implant therapy to improve the prognosis of oral implant treatment.

conclusionsOral implant systems have been found to function with very good clinical outcome over follow-up times of 20-30 years. Registered implant failures have occurred predominantly during the first few years after implantation, and there has been no significant increase in late failures due to peri-implantitis.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossDental ImplantsPeri-ImplantitisDental Prosthesis DesignHumansOsseointegrationDental Implantsbone resorptiondental implantsimmuno-modulationperi-implantitis

Identifiers

PMID35639515
PMCPMC9542069
OpenAlexW4281672001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.