Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639495›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2022

Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool.

Katherine P Pryor, Bill Albert, Sonali Desai, Susan Y Ritter, Laura Tarter, Jonathan Coblyn, Bonnie L Bermas, Leah M Santacroce, Caryn Dutton, Kari P Braaten and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04879745 (A Pilot Study of the MyVoice), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04879745 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Study of the MyVoice:Rheum Decision Aid to Address the Reproductive Health Needs of Women With Rheumatic Diseases

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2021 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsRheumatic Diseases, Physician-Patient Relations, ContraceptionArmsMyVoice:Rheum, Pamphlet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Katherine P PryorBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4698-125X
Bill AlbertPower to Decide, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sonali DesaiBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Susan Y RitterBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura TarterBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jonathan CoblynBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bonnie L BermasUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-4084
Leah M SantacroceBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-2296
Caryn DuttonBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kari P BraatenBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lydia E PaceBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kathryn RexrodeBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth JaniakBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Candace H FeldmanBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-9770

Funding

Brigham and Women's Hospital Brighamcareredesignincubatorandstartupprogram(BCRISP)Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSystemic rheumatic conditions affect reproductive-aged patients and often require potentially teratogenic medications. We assessed the feasibility and impact of a standardized pregnancy intention screening question (One Key Question [OKQ]) in a large academic rheumatology practice.

methodsThis 6-month pilot quality improvement initiative prompted rheumatologists to ask female patients aged 18 to 49 years about their pregnancy intentions using OKQ. We administered surveys to assess rheumatologists' barriers to and comfort with reproductive health issues. We performed chart reviews to assess uptake and impact on documentation, comparing charts with OKQ documented with 100 randomly selected charts eligible for pregnancy intention screening but without OKQ documented.

resultsWhen we compared 32 of 43 preimplementation responses with 29 of 41 postimplementation responses, the proportion of rheumatologists who reported they were very comfortable with assessing their patients' reproductive goals increased (31%-38%) and the proportion reporting obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) referral challenges as barriers to discussing reproductive goals decreased (41%-21%). During the implementation period, 83 of 957 (9%) eligible patients had OKQ documented in their chart. Female providers were more likely to screen than male providers (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.21-4.85). Screened patients were more likely to have their contraceptive method documented (P < 0.001) and more likely to have been referred to OB/GYN for follow-up (P = 0.003) compared with patients who were not screened with OKQ.

conclusionAlthough uptake was low, this tool improved provider comfort with assessing reproductive goals, the quality of documentation, and the likelihood of OB/GYN referral. Future studies should examine whether automated medical record alerts to prompt screening increase uptake.

Identifiers

PMID35639495
PMCPMC9374050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.