Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639461›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Development of a Web-Based Decision Aid and Planning Tool for Family Building After Cancer (Roadmap to Parenthood): Usability Testing.

Catherine Benedict, Katherine L Dauber-Decker, Jennifer S Ford, D'Arcy King, David Spiegel, Lidia Schapira, Pamela Simon, Michael Diefenbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Online decision aids for contraceptive choices in women with chronic conditions: A systematic review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perceived impact of a decision-aid and planning tool for family building after cancer for young adult female cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catherine Benedict *Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9622-249X
Katherine L Dauber-DeckerDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0498-8779
Jennifer S FordHunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7373-6949
D'Arcy KingDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7947-5145
David SpiegelStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9476-9173
Lidia SchapiraStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3298-9103
Pamela SimonLucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3835-1247
Michael DiefenbachDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2821-1507

Funding

Family-building After Cancer: Preferences, Decisions, and Planning for Young Female SurvivorsK07CA229186 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BENEDICT, CATHERINE · 2018 to 2023
$696k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA229186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOwing to gonadotoxic cancer treatments, young adult female survivors often report uncertainty about their fertility, reproductive potential, and family-building options after treatment. Roadmap to Parenthood is a web-based decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer.

objectiveAs part of a patient-centered development process, this study evaluated the usability of the decision aid website to inform design modifications and improve user experience.

methodsIn total, 2 rounds of usability testing were conducted with the target population of young adult female cancer survivors. During the testing sessions, participants viewed the website twice; first, as a think-aloud exercise, and second, while a researcher interrupted at key points to obtain user feedback. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected to assess website usability. Quantitative measures included the System Usability Scale, WebQual, and eHealth Impact Questionnaire. An exit interview with open-ended questions gathered feedback on likes and dislikes and suggestions for improvement.

resultsParticipants (N=10) were young adult women, with average age of 30.9 (SD 4.51) years, and average time since treatment was 4.44 (SD 3.56) years. Website usability scores improved on the System Usability Scale from "acceptable" in round 1 to "excellent" in round 2 after making design changes based on user feedback (scores of 68 and 89.4, respectively). WebQual scores showed similar improvement from round 1 to round 2 of testing (mean 5.6 to 6.25; range 1-7). On the eHealth Impact Questionnaire, the information and presentation of the website was perceived as comprehensive, easy to understand, and trustworthy. Participants also reported improved confidence to discuss and manage fertility and family-building issues and felt encouraged to play a more active role in managing their fertility. In all, 3 usability themes were identified from the qualitative feedback: ease of use, visibility and navigation, and informational content and usefulness. Overall feedback was positive, and participants reported intentions to use the decision aid website in the future. In total, 10% (1/10) of the participants reported negative emotions when learning about infertility risks and potential family-building challenges.

conclusionsWebsite usability improved after design changes were made in response to user feedback. Young adult female survivors reported positive views about the website and indicated that the decision aid would be useful in decision-making about family building after cancer. Future studies will include further design modifications to consider the emotional experiences of users and any additional navigational features or content to optimize the ease of use and support provided by the tool.

Indexed as

cancer survivorshipdecision aidsdecision-makingfertilitymobile phonereproductive healthyoung adult cancer

Identifiers

PMID35639461
PMCPMC9198824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.