ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2022
Drowning in antibiotics.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths (NCEPOD) report recommended that 'fluid prescribing be given the same value as drug prescribing', yet fluid prescription is commonly delegated to junior doctors despite being a notoriously challenging topic. When antibiotics are given as an infusion they are diluted in 100ml of fluid, which is often unaccounted for when thinking about a patient's fluid requirements. This closed-loop audit aimed to assess first, intravenous (IV) fluid therapy and second, electrolyte prescribing compliance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, with and without the additional fluid given with antibiotic administration.
methodsTwo retrospective audits were performed. Total fluid and electrolyte volume received with and without antibiotic fluids was correlated with recommendations in the NICE guidelines. Between cycles 1 and 2, potassium chloride with sodium chloride and glucose (PSG) was introduced as an alternative to IV maintenance fluid, and bolusing of antibiotics was mandatory.
resultsWhen analysing total fluid volume input per day, 10.4% and 7.45% of patients met their fluid requirement accurately in the first and second cycles, respectively. Within cycle 1, the mean total additional fluid that was given over 3 days with antibiotics was 1,572.73ml. In cycle 2, this decreased to 469.44ml when antibiotics were given as a bolus.
conclusionsIn this closed-loop audit we noted that patients receiving IV fluids and IV antibiotics received too much additional fluid when the antibiotic dilution fluid was taken into account. Additional fluid was reduced alongside the proportion of electrolyte complications when bolusing of antibiotics was introduced. We recommend that that all nurses are trained to give antibiotics as a bolus because it can help to reduce fluid-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.