Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639453›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2022

Drowning in antibiotics.

C L Gelder, S Robinson, F Leitch, A J McMahon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C L GelderNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK.
S RobinsonUniversity of Glasgow, UK.
F LeitchNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK.
A J McMahonNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths (NCEPOD) report recommended that 'fluid prescribing be given the same value as drug prescribing', yet fluid prescription is commonly delegated to junior doctors despite being a notoriously challenging topic. When antibiotics are given as an infusion they are diluted in 100ml of fluid, which is often unaccounted for when thinking about a patient's fluid requirements. This closed-loop audit aimed to assess first, intravenous (IV) fluid therapy and second, electrolyte prescribing compliance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, with and without the additional fluid given with antibiotic administration.

methodsTwo retrospective audits were performed. Total fluid and electrolyte volume received with and without antibiotic fluids was correlated with recommendations in the NICE guidelines. Between cycles 1 and 2, potassium chloride with sodium chloride and glucose (PSG) was introduced as an alternative to IV maintenance fluid, and bolusing of antibiotics was mandatory.

resultsWhen analysing total fluid volume input per day, 10.4% and 7.45% of patients met their fluid requirement accurately in the first and second cycles, respectively. Within cycle 1, the mean total additional fluid that was given over 3 days with antibiotics was 1,572.73ml. In cycle 2, this decreased to 469.44ml when antibiotics were given as a bolus.

conclusionsIn this closed-loop audit we noted that patients receiving IV fluids and IV antibiotics received too much additional fluid when the antibiotic dilution fluid was taken into account. Additional fluid was reduced alongside the proportion of electrolyte complications when bolusing of antibiotics was introduced. We recommend that that all nurses are trained to give antibiotics as a bolus because it can help to reduce fluid-related complications.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrowningElectrolytesFluid TherapyHumansRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsElectrolytesCompliance with NICE guidelinesFluid balanceIntravenous fluid therapyNICE guidelines

Identifiers

PMID35639453
PMCPMC9433187
OpenAlexW4281773673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.