Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35639396›Full record

SynthesisColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2022

Patient reported outcome measures assessing quality of life in patients with an intestinal stoma: A systematic review.

Christian Valdemar Skibsted, Bente Thoft Jensen, Therese Juul, Helle Ø Kristensen

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Patient reported outcome measures assessing quality of life in patients with an intestinal stoma: A systematic review.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Determinant of quality of life among colorectal cancer patients with a stoma: a single-center cross-sectional study in Egypt.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  6. Measuring symptoms in parastomal hernia: a prospective evaluation using MYMOP2.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Development and pilot testing of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess symptoms of parastomal hernia.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian Valdemar SkibstedDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6923-1531
Bente Thoft JensenDepartment of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3174-9121
Therese JuulDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5411-4826
Helle Ø KristensenDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0153-7689
Aarhus University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimLiving with a stoma can greatly influence quality of life. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify all patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessing health related quality of life (HRQoL) or similar constructs related to an intestinal stoma and to evaluate their level of validation.

methodsThe study was reported in line with PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO prior to the study. Eligible studies were any study investigating psychometric properties of a stoma-specific PROM. The databases MedLine, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Libraries were searched for eligible studies. Studies were screened on title and abstract, then full-text for eligibility. Data extraction on the study populations, PROM characteristics, psychometric properties as well as quality assessment using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was performed.

resultsIn total, 40 studies were included concerning the development and/or validation of 21 PROMs. For most PROMs, few psychometric properties were assessed. In general, quality of content validity was poor, quality of construct validity and reliability was good. Assessment of responsiveness was lacking.

conclusionThis systematic review offers an overview of existing PROMs measuring stoma-related HRQoL and their psychometric properties. A large number of PROMs exist and their measures overlap considerably. The PROMs generally have a low level of validation, emphasizing the need for future studies to further validate existing PROMs, rather than developing new ones.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Resultspatient reported outcome measuresquality of lifestomasystematic reviewvalidation

Identifiers

PMID35639396
PMCPMC9796962
OpenAlexW4281831531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.