ArticleRadiology2022
MR Elastography of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Relationship to Aneurysm Events.
Article in Radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifrequency Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Abdominal Aortic Wall: Segmental, Positional and Flow Effects.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nano-mechanical mapping of human and porcine abdominal aortic aneurysm.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Multifunctional nanoparticles in abdominal aortic aneurysm management: from basic research to clinical transformation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Augmented expression of superoxide dismutase 2 mitigates progression and rupture of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm.Theranostics · 2025Article
- Characterizing changes in abdominal aortic aneurysms using principal wall strain ultrasound elastography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Prediction of the need for surgery in patients with unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm based on SOFA score.PloS one · 2025Article
- Predicting the growth of asymptomatic small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) based on deep learning.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- New Trends of Personalized Medicine in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- In Vivo Quantification of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stretch Using MRI: Relationship to Repair Threshold Diameter and Ex Vivo Wall Failure Behavior.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
- Tumor biomechanical stiffness by magnetic resonance elastography predicts surgical outcomes and identifies biomarkers in vestibular schwannoma and meningioma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Intermediate pressure-normalized principal wall strain values are associated with increased abdominal aortic aneurysmal growth rates.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Predictive models for abdominal aortic aneurysms using polygenic scores and PheWAS-derived risk factors.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023Article
- The effect of smoking on quantification of aortic stiffness by ultrasound time-harmonic elastography.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter remains the standard clinical parameter to predict growth and rupture. Studies suggest that using solely AAA diameter for risk stratification is insufficient. Purpose To evaluate the use of aortic MR elastography (MRE)-derived AAA stiffness and stiffness ratio at baseline to identify the potential for future aneurysm rupture or need for surgical repair. Materials and Methods Between August 2013 and March 2019, 72 participants with AAA and 56 healthy participants were enrolled in this prospective study. MRE examinations were performed to estimate AAA stiffness and the stiffness ratio between AAA and its adjacent remote normal aorta. Two Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess AAA stiffness and stiffness ratio for predicting aneurysmal events (subsequent repair, rupture, or diameter >5.0 cm). Log-rank tests were performed to determine a critical stiffness ratio suggesting high-risk AAAs. Baseline AAA stiffness and stiffness ratio were studied using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests between participants with and without aneurysmal events. Spearman correlation was used to investigate the relationship between stiffness and other potential imaging markers. Results Seventy-two participants with AAA (mean age, 71 years ± 9 [SD]; 56 men and 16 women) and 56 healthy participants (mean age, 42 years ± 16; 27 men and 29 women) were evaluated. In healthy participants, aortic stiffness positively correlated with age (ρ = 0.44;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.