ArticleJournal of virology2022
Changes to the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) Reservoir and Enhanced SIV-Specific Responses in a Rhesus Macaque Model of Functional Cure after Serial Rounds of Romidepsin Administrations.
Article in Journal of virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
HIV persistence requires lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART), calling for a cure. The histone deacetylase inhibitor, romidepsin, is used in the "shock and kill" approach with the goal of reactivating virus and subsequently clearing infected cells through cell-mediated immune responses. We tested serial and double infusions of romidepsin in a rhesus macaque (RM) model of SIV functional cure, which controls virus without ART. Off ART, romidepsin reactivated SIV in all RMs. Subsequent infusions resulted in diminished reactivation, and two RMs did not reactivate the virus after the second or third infusions. Therefore, those two RMs received CD8-depleting antibody to assess the replication competence of the residual reservoir. The remaining RMs received double infusions, i.e., two doses separated by 48-h. Double infusions were well tolerated, induced immune activation, and effectively reactivated SIV. Although reactivation was gradually diminished, cell-associated viral DNA was minimally changed, and viral outgrowth occurred in 4/5 RMs. In the RM which did not reactivate after CD8 depletion, viral outgrowth was not detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)-derived CD4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.