Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35638587›Full record

ReviewConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2022

Challenges and a call to action for protecting European red wood ants.

Paride Balzani, Wouter Dekoninck, Heike Feldhaar, Anne Freitag, Filippo Frizzi, Jan Frouz, Alberto Masoni, Elva Robinson, Jouni Sorvari, Giacomo Santini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impacts of biological invasions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Challenges and a call to action for protecting European red wood ants.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paride BalzaniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1549-7139
Wouter DekoninckRoyal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium.
Heike FeldhaarDepartment of Animal Ecology I, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Anne FreitagCantonal Museum of Zoology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Filippo FrizziDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Jan FrouzInstitute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Alberto MasoniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Elva RobinsonDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4914-9327
Jouni SorvariDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Giacomo SantiniDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red wood ants (RWAs) are a group of keystone species widespread in temperate and boreal forests of the Northern Hemisphere. Despite this, there is increasing evidence of local declines and extinctions. We reviewed the current protection status of RWAs throughout Europe and their International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) threat classification. Only some RWA species have been assessed at a global scale, and not all national red lists of the countries where RWAs are present include these species. Different assessment criteria, inventory approaches, and risk categories are used in different countries, and data deficiency is frequent. Legislative protection is even more complex, with some countries protecting RWAs implicitly together with the wildlife fauna and others explicitly protecting the whole group or particular species. This complexity often occurs within countries, for example, in Italy, where, outside of the Alps, only the introduced species are protected, whereas the native species, which are in decline, are not. Therefore, an international, coordinated framework is needed for the protection of RWAs. This first requires that the conservation target should be defined. Due to the similar morphology, complex taxonomy, and frequent hybridization, protecting the entire RWA group seems a more efficient strategy than protecting single species, although with a distinction between autochthonous and introduced species. Second, an update of the current distribution of RWA species is needed throughout Europe. Third, a protection law cannot be effective without the collaboration of forest managers, whose activity influences RWA habitat. Finally, RWA mounds offer a peculiar microhabitat, hosting a multitude of taxa, some of which are obligate myrmecophilous species on the IUCN Red List. Therefore, RWAs' role as umbrella species could facilitate their protection if they are considered not only as target species but also as providers of species-rich microhabitats.

Indexed as

AntsAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEuropeForestsconservation targetdiversidad forestalforest diversityFormica rufa groupgrupo Formia rufahormiga roja de la maderainsectosinsectslegislaciónlegislationobjetivo de conservaciónred wood ants保护目标昆虫森林多样性立法红褐山蚁红褐山蚁 (Formica rufa) 群

Identifiers

PMID35638587
PMCPMC10086985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.