Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35638470›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2022

Sex and male breeding state predict intraspecific trait variation in mouth-brooding fishes.

Janine E Abecia, Osmar J Luiz, David A Crook, Sam C Banks, Dion Wedd, Alison J King

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janine E AbeciaResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4271-8830
Osmar J LuizResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.
David A CrookResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.
Sam C BanksResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.
Dion WeddResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.
Alison J KingResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.
Charles Darwin University · AULa Trobe University · AU

Funding

Australian Research CouncilCharles Darwin University Research Training Program ScholarshipNorthern Territory Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex-specific reproductive roles contribute to sexual dimorphic morphological trait variations. In uniparental mouth-brooding fishes, the mouth performs a reproductive function in addition to its key roles in feeding and respiration, resulting in the potential for sex-specific functional performance trade-offs. Trait differences related to parental care may occur when the individual matures or be restricted to periods when the parent is mouth-brooding. This study explored sexual dimorphism and morphological trait adaptations related to feeding, breeding, respiration and locomotion performance in two paternal mouth-brooding freshwater fishes (Glossamia aprion and Neoarius graeffei). Eight morphological traits were evaluated for sexual dimorphism (non-brooder males vs. females) and male breeding state differences (brooders vs. non-brooders). Male breeding state was a significant predictor of trait variation in both species. Brooders differed in buccal volume and in several feeding and locomotory traits compared to non-brooder males. Non-brooder males had bigger buccal volumes and relative eye diameters (G. aprion) and larger relative gape sizes (N. graeffei) compared to females, a potential response to both mouth-brooding and feeding requirements. Although there were clear trait differences between brooder and non-brooder males, further research is required to confirm whether individuals return to their former morphology once mouth-brooding has ceased or if trait differences are maintained post-brooding. This study highlights the importance of considering the potential impacts of intraspecific trait variation on the performance of critical life functions, such as feeding, respiration and locomotion across the life history.

Indexed as

FishesPerciformesAnimalsFemaleMaleMouthPhenotypeReproductionSex Characteristicsfreshwaterfunctional ecologynorthern Australiaparental caresexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID35638470
PMCPMC9544576
OpenAlexW4281665194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.