Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35638317›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2022

The effect of duloxetine on mechanistic pain profiles, cognitive factors and clinical pain in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis-A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

Kristian Kjaer-Staal Petersen, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Anne Estrup Olesen, Nadia Ammitzbøll, Davide Bertoli, Christina Brock, Lars Arendt-Nielsen

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Cancer pain.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Chronic Pain and Cognitive Dysfunction: Clinical Implement, Mechanism, and Therapeutic Strategy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The use of cannabidiol (CBD) as an analgesic component.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Precision Medicine in Neuropathic Pain.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristian Kjaer-Staal PetersenCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4506-000X
Asbjørn Mohr DrewesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anne Estrup OlesenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Nadia AmmitzbøllDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Davide BertoliDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Christina BrockDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lars Arendt-NielsenCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKAalborg University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuloxetine is indicated in the management of pain in osteoarthritis. Evidence suggests that duloxetine modulates central pain mechanisms and cognitive factors, and these factors are assumed contributing to the analgesic effect. This proof-of-mechanism, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover, double-blinded trial evaluated the effect of duloxetine on quantitative sensory testing (QST), cognitive factors and clinical pain in patients with osteoarthritis and to predict the analgesic effect.

methodsTwenty-five patients completed this cross-over study with either 18-week duloxetine (maximum 60 mg/daily) followed by placebo or vice-versa. Pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation were assessed using cuff algometry. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale evaluated cognitive factors. Clinical pain was assessed using Brief Pain Inventory and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Linear regression models were used to predict the analgesic effect of duloxetine.

resultsDepending on the clinical pain outcome, 40%-68% of patients were classified as responders to duloxetine. Linear regression models predicted the analgesic effect (predictive value of 45%-75% depending on clinical pain outcome parameter) using a combination of pretreatment QST parameters, cognitive factors and clinical pain. No significant changes were found for QST, cognitive factors or clinical pain on a group level when comparing duloxetine to placebo.

conclusionA combination of pretreatment QST, cognitive factors and clinical pain was able to predict the analgesic response of duloxetine. However, in this relatively small study, duloxetine did not selectively modulate QST, cognitive factors or clinical pain intensity when compared with placebo. SIGNIFICANCE: Duloxetine is proposed as a treatment for chronic pain. Pre-clinical trials suggest that duloxetine provides analgesia through modulation of descending pain inhibitory pathways or through improvements in cognitive factors. The current study demonstrates that pretreatment mechanistic pain profiling, cognitive factors and clinical pain can predict the analgesic effect of duloxetine and that only a subset of patients might benefit from duloxetine treatment.

Indexed as

Chronic PainOsteoarthritis, KneeAnalgesicsCognitionCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDuloxetine HydrochlorideHumansTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsDuloxetine Hydrochloride

Identifiers

PMID35638317
PMCPMC9541875
OpenAlexW4281900950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.